Search: No in transcription-available 
Scott, John in author 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 52 items

From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
11 Nov 1862
Source of text:
DAR 177: 77
Summary:

CD is mistaken in considering Acropera unisexual, with only male flowers [Orchids, pp. 203–10]. JS has successfully fertilised two A. loddigesii flowers. One is ripening. Dissection of the other shows the pollen accomplishes fertilisation without contacting any stigmatic surface. Abortive ovules found in flowers that did not become fertilised when pollinated. JS suggests Acropera has both unisexual male and hermaphrodite flowers.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Nov [1862]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 78
Summary:

Appreciates CD’s acknowledging his letter and his comments on Acropera. Will send CD the Acropera capsule which is now maturing.

Experimenting on vegetable parthenogenesis.

Structure of Acropera.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[20 Nov – 2 Dec 1862]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 79
Summary:

JS does not fully accept natural selection.

Has never raised oxlips from cowslips or primroses; reports of such must be cases of crossing.

Discusses relative fertility of varieties, self-fertility of hybrids, and plans for experiments on enhanced hybrid fertility.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Dec [1862]
Source of text:
DAR 108: 182a–d
Summary:

JS not ready to publish on Primula.

Some of his objections to natural selection are based on belief that plants with separate sexes are less variable than those in which sexes are confluent (as in ferns).

Sends his paper on fern varieties [Edinburgh New Philos. J. 2d ser. 16 (1862): 209–27].

Will soon read paper on Drosera irritability [Edinburgh New Philos. J. 2d ser. 17 (1863): 317–18].

How does CD explain capricious distribution of irritability among plants?

P. scotica’s non-dimorphism is native.

Beginning Laelia experiments shortly.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Dec [1862]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 80
Summary:

Thanks for Journal of researches and Origin.

Thanks CD for comments on his fern paper [see 3847 and 3853]; has great difficulty in expressing his ideas.

Discusses inheritance and variation.

Asks CD for an account of the experiments he would like JS to perform.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Jan 1863
Source of text:
DAR 177: 81, 83
Summary:

Sends Primula scotica and P. farinosa.

So far cannot fertilise Gongora atropurpurea although it is similar to Acropera luteola.

Experimenting on intergeneric hybrids to test CD’s view that sterility is not a special endowment.

Scott’s personal history.

Acropera capsule grows.

Plans for experiments CD has suggested on Primula, peloric Antirrhinum, and Verbascum.

Asks about Gärtner’s experiments on maize.

Aware of Anderson-Henry’s failures.

Through kindness of J. H. Balfour and James McNab, enjoys facilities for research. JS is in charge of the propagating department. Balfour almost engaged him to be superintendent of the Madras Horticultural Garden.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 Jan 1863
Source of text:
DAR 177: 82
Summary:

Experiments to cut Laelia stigma from rostellum and then to fertilise rostellum are baffled by "a latent instinctive power". Somehow the pollen-tubes find their way to the style.

Suggests CD study variation in ferns.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Feb [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 84
Summary:

Sends Acropera capsule for CD to dissect.

Will try to raise Acropera from seed (never done before in Britain) to examine its sexual forms.

Studying primroses, parthenogenesis, and reproduction of some cryptogams.

Received maize varieties from CD.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 108: 179
Summary:

JS criticises natural selection as based on an innate "continuously watchful selective principle".

Seeks seed of wild Rocky Mountain maize.

What is CD’s view on origin of maize?

Seeks information on self-sterility of Passiflora and Lobelia.

Weeping habit of trees.

Intended to say bisexual plants presented more established varieties than unisexual, not that they are more variable.

Explains his opinion that homomorphically fertilised Primula will produce only their own form. Is trying homomorphic crosses with different coloured Primula varieties.

Asks to read Asa Gray’s 2d review of Orchids.

Has finally successfully fertilised Gongora, but it was done by unnatural means.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 85
Summary:

Thanks for CD’s answers on Passiflora

and Asa Gray review.

Has observed gradation of sterility in Oncidium species.

Has observed rostellar germination and fertilisation in Laelia. The latter was prevented in Bletia by covering the stigma with plaster of Paris.

Gongora atropurpurea capsules are swelling.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[1–11] Apr [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 108: 183, DAR 177: 86 (fragile)
Summary:

Studying self-sterility, particularly in Oncidium, where abortion occurs consistently but stigma functions normally. His hybrid orchid crosses show sterility occurs capriciously. Thus it is not a "special endowment".

Disputes Asa Gray’s and Hermann Crüger’s view of rostellar germination.

Doubts absolute sterility of Catasetum.

Disappointed by results with homomorphic cowslips.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 12] Apr [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 87
Summary:

Thanks for CD’s Linum paper [Collected papers 2: 93–105].

Has not published much because he would be ignored as a gardener; hence he is looking for a foreign appointment.

Has prepared orchid sterility paper at CD’s suggestion [Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 7 (1863): 543–50].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 108: 181, DAR 177: 88
Summary:

Supports, in his orchid paper, CD’s view that sterility occurs at random [Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 7 (1863): 543–50].

Cannot get his Drosera paper published [abstract in Edinburgh New Philos. J. 2d ser. 17 (1863): 317–18].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 May 1863
Source of text:
DAR 177: 90
Summary:

J. H. Balfour has arranged a position for him at a Cinchona nursery. Reluctant to take this position in part because of his experiments for CD.

Asks CD’s advice and solicits his aid in finding a better colonial position. James McNab mistreats him.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 91
Summary:

Discusses Darjeeling position. Thanks CD for advice.

Will send orchid paper [see 4087].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 92
Summary:

Sends abstract from Edinburgh Courant of his orchid sterility paper [see 4087]. Balfour altered title to obscure its theoretical nature.

Sends specimens showing curious variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[3 June 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 93
Summary:

Thanks CD for influence used with Hooker to obtain a colonial position. Has offended J. H. Balfour by refusing the Darjeeling post and James McNab has become unfriendly, although his experiments do not detract from his garden work.

Will write Primula paper for Linnean Society as CD suggests.

His Darwinism is unpalatable at Edinburgh Botanic Garden.

Describes results with non-dimorphic Primula species. Such cases do not accord with CD’s view that characters are slowly acquired.

Thanks for criticism of his writing style.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 June [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 94
Summary:

Orchid paper in press.

Asks CD to correct MS of his Primula paper [J. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Bot.) 8 (1865): 78–126].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 July [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 95
Summary:

Discusses heterostyly in Hottonia.

Criticises L. C. Treviranus’ statements on Primula longiflora’s having short-styled form.

Describes his results with crossing different coloured primroses. Will let CD, when he reads his paper, decide whether his finding white and red varieties perfectly sterile when crossed, yet fertile inter se, ought to be published.

Difficulty in getting his orchid paper published in Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[26 July – 2 Aug 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 89
Summary:

His orchid paper limited because he does not give illustrations from distinct genera.

Discusses the self- and cross-fertility of coloured primrose varieties. Thanks CD for tables of unpublished Primula work.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project