Search: No in transcription-available 
Darwin Correspondence Project in contributor 
1840-1849::1849 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 82 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Gabriel-Auguste (Auguste) Daubrée
Date:
[1849?]
Source of text:
Institut de France, Bibliothèque (Ms 2423 A ff. 69–70)
Summary:

Had hoped to sent specimens by carrier that day; intends to sent them next Thursday.

Thanks for German scientific newspaper: two articles interested him.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Richard Owen
Date:
[1849?]
Source of text:
Houghton Library, Harvard University (Autograph File, D)
Summary:

CD proposes to call for tea if he is well enough on Thursday.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Richard Weld
Date:
[1849]
Source of text:
Jeff Weber, Rare Books (dealer) (January 2013)
Summary:

Will return books, and asks for more.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
29 Jan [1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

Has altered and added to HES’s list [compiled for Bibliographia zoologiæ et geologiæ, edited by Louis Agassiz and enlarged by HES, (1848–54)].

On zoological nomenclature CD cites a case in which he believes more harm than good would be done by following the rule of priority. Thinks the rule of the first describer’s name being attached in perpetuity to a species has been the greatest curse to natural history. Every genus of cirripedes has a half-dozen names and not one careful description.

Sends a paper he once wrote [missing] on the subject [of zoological nomenclature].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 Jan 1849
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

Responds to CD’s two objections to the principles involved in the "Rules of zoological nomenclature": (1) that strict enforcement of the rule of priority would cause much inconvenience, and (2) attaching name of the first describer in perpetuity puts a premium on careless description by "species mongers".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Jackson Hooker
Date:
[c. Feb 1849]
Source of text:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Directors’ Correspondence English letters A–J 1849, 27: 155)
Summary:

Thanks WJH for information on J. D. Hooker’s progress.

J. D. Hooker promised a copy of his Galapagos paper. Can WJH forward one to the Athenaeum?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Feb 1849
Source of text:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (India letters 1847–51: 131–5 JDH/1/10)
Summary:

Physical description of Sikkim mountains.

Travelling through Kinchin snows.

Transported boulders.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Feb 1849
Source of text:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (India letters 1847–51: 136–7 JDH/1/10)
Summary:

Continues prior letter of this date. Has received CD’s [1202]. Thanks CD for saving his correspondence.

Sent "a yarn about species" in October mail.

Some "puerile" JDH letters printed in Athenæum.

Requests CD extract anything valuable from his letters to CD and Lyell for Athenæum.

CD’s complemental males in barnacles wonderful.

Warns CD to drop his battle about perpetuity of names in species descriptions.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
[4 Feb 1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

HES’s arguments are of great weight, but CD cannot yet bring himself to reject well-known names for obscure ones. Sends four cases that he thinks will stagger HES. Cites his problems in classifying cirripedes. CD cannot bear to give new names, yet may do wrong to attach old ones. Not one species is correctly defined. The harm done by "species mongers".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Darwin Fox
Date:
6 Feb [1849]
Source of text:
Christ’s College Library, Cambridge (MS 53 Fox 71)
Summary:

His memory of his recently deceased father is a treasure to him.

Thanks WDF for information on the water-cure. Dislikes the thought of it.

Reports results of his experiments with tied-up fruit-trees.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Salt
To:
Erasmus Alvey Darwin
Date:
8 Feb 1849
Source of text:
Shropshire Archives (SA D3651/B/47/1/11)
Summary:

Discusses the division of R. W. Darwin’s estate.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Feb 1849
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

The priority rule has only diverted vanity to a rush to be first. Has no objection to CD’s suggestion that good books be quoted in preference to first descriptions if there is a chance by this means of developing this silly vanity into ambition to advance knowledge. Still, this must not affect the rule of priority. Responds to CD’s four cases.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Johannes Peter (Johannes) Müller
Date:
10 Feb [1849]
Source of text:
Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz (Slg. Darmstaedter Lc 1859: Darwin, Charles, Bl. 216–217 )
Summary:

Requests JPM’s assistance by lending or giving him cirripede specimens. The anatomy of cirripedes has been most imperfectly done, and their classification is a perfect chaos.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
10 Feb [1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

HES’s letter will fructify to some extent: CD will try to be more faithful to rigid virtue and priority. Would not adopt his own notion in cirripede book without prior approval by others. Will not append "Darwin" to any of his species. Feels sure many others share his aversion.

Asks HES’s opinion on retention of generic name Conchoderma.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Feb 1849
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

Clarifies the notion and use of type-species and applies it to CD’s problem with Conchoderma.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Smith, Elder & Co
Date:
[16 Feb 1849]
Source of text:
Edward Ford (private collection)
Summary:

Asks for account on South America and sales of Coral reefs and Volcanic islands.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
[19 Feb 1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

Thanks HES for solving his problem. Has some difficulty with HES’s type-species. In arranging genera in a natural order it is often impossible to say which species should be considered the type.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
James Scott Bowerbank
Date:
24 Feb [1849]
Source of text:
Formerly Leeds City Libraries; for sale at Bonhams (dealers) (13 March 2002)
Summary:

Thanks him for cirripede specimens.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Richard Owen
Date:
[24 Feb 1849]
Source of text:
Archives of the New York Botanical Garden (Charles Finney Cox Collection)
Summary:

Thanks RO for his note on Conchoderma hunteri [see Living Cirripedia 1: 153].

Has been very unwell; has lost four-fifths of his time. Will go to Malvern to try the water-cure for his vomiting, which regular doctors cannot cure.

Has done some pretty homological work with cirripedes.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Peter Lund Simmonds
Date:
25 Feb [1849]
Source of text:
Linnean Society of London (Quentin Keynes collection)
Summary:

Sends detailed report on the prospects for a settlement on the coast of Patagonia, pointing out many problems, and recommending instead the Falkland Islands.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project