Search: No in transcription-available 
John Herschel Project in contributor 
1840-1849::1842 in date 
Hunt, Robert in addressee 
Sorted by:

Showing 17 of 7 items

From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Robert Hunt
Date:
[15 March 1842]
Source of text:
George Eastman House, 12.17
Summary:

Believes that the operative rays in JH's thermographic process are neither 'calorific' nor 'thermal'.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Robert Hunt
Date:
1842-5
Source of text:
George Eastman House, 10.17 (C: RS:HS 22.117)
Summary:

Some information about Charles Piazzi Smyth. JH needs information about some of RH's photographic paper, which JH has tried but without success.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Robert Hunt
Date:
[2 June 1842]
Source of text:
George Eastman House, 9.17 (C: RS:HS 22.121)
Summary:

Sorry to hear RH has been ill; JH sends some photographic examples.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Robert Hunt
Date:
1842-9
Source of text:
George Eastman House, 8.17 (C: RS:HS 22.133)
Summary:

Thanks for RH's paper on mineralogy. JH has explored use of mercury together with iron in photography.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Robert Hunt
Date:
[2 December 1842]
Source of text:
George Eastman House, 11.17 (C: RS:HS 22.143)
Summary:

Sends RH a packet of photographs with a description of each type.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Robert Hunt
Date:
[1842-12-9 or later]
Source of text:
RS:HS 25.14.15
Summary:

Is anxious for some means to be developed to get a measurable quantity [preferably by weight] from the action of a beam of light on a surface. JH has been experimenting in photography with 'flouric' compounds.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Robert Hunt
Date:
12?] December [1842
Source of text:
George Eastman House, 6.17
Summary:

Read John William Draper's papers; although he believes that Draper's instruments are inconsistent, JH feels that they are still important because they are measurable. Decries [L. F.] Moser's skepticism of photography's value, calling it a 'blindfolding to some of the most interesting physical relations that have ever been discovered.'

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
Addressee
Document type
Transcription available