Search: No in transcription-available 
1790-1799::1794::02 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 110 of 10 items

From:
Jane Macartney
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
3 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/24/1, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Asks Smith to enquire after the bird-mounter he recommended her, as he has not returned her birds at the promised time, which include the Argos pheasant.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Antonio José Cavanilles
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
4 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/3/50, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Second volume finished but cannot be sent owing to war; working on manuscript of his travels.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Jane Macartney
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
[6 Feb 1794]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/24/2, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Wyatt [bird-mounter] has returned the birds but considers the charges too high; requests Smith's opinion.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Thomas Jenkinson Woodward
Date:
9 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/18/80, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sends perfect copy of his "Tour" and copies of his "New Holland" work; particularly pleased with his description of 'Billardiera'. Examined 'Fucus confervoides' of Linnaean herbarium and confirms it is 'F. vesuicosus' [William] Hudson and not 'F. albidus', finds no 'F. incurous' Hudson in herbarium. Mr Egerton the only one of [Samuel] Goodenough's pupils to die [from a fever at Goodenough's school]. Visited North Walsham, [Norfolk], to meet botanist Revd Mr Hepworth. Will be in Norwich in June to lecture on botany and zoology for 6 weeks.

Thanks for Woodward's good opinion of his "Tour"; opinion of others including his Windsor friend and Sir Abraham and Lady [Amelia] Hume, despite Sir Abraham being a friend of [Edmund] Burke [(1730-1797), politician] and an "alarmist"; has heard nothing of De Luc's or the Queen's [Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (1744-1818)] opinion; only criticism received so far is from his "honest but bigotted friend" [Thomas] Marhsam, "a furious friend of the slave trade & an enemy of Dr [Joseph] Priestly [(1733-1804), theologian]", who says he did wrong in mentioning Priestly.

[Letter incomplete: lower two-thirds of second folio cropped, text presumed destroyed]

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Adam Afzelius
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
13 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/29, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Has been prevented from sailing to Sierra Leone by unfavourable weather but hopes to depart soon. Pleased that Smith proposes to publish a new edition of Hudson's "Flora Anglica". Claims priority in botanical works as discoverer of plants he found first. Values Smith's letters and friendship and asks him to write to him in Sierra Leone.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
George Leonard Staunton
Date:
15 February 1794
Source of text:
MM/19/121, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Richard Pulteney
Date:
15 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/MS238/14, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for Pulteney's letter of 30 January [1794]. Happy his work is approved by so "intelligent & candid a judge"; his sentiments in that work have been generally approved, and sells well. Intends to name a genus after Pulteney. Will send more New Holland plants in due course. Has heard nothing of L'Héritier since the war. Glad [Aylmer Bourke] Lambert is so well, the young man with him [Francesco Borone] will say much of Sierra Leone.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Eduard Sandifort
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
17 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/8, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Finally received parcel of Smith's works, all of which find "great favour" here; disappointed no supplement to any has been published. Hopes to receive "Linnean Transactions" vol 2, Smith's "Tour", and the new work Smith mentioned. Requests second volume of "Asiatick Researches" and asks if third part of "Speculi Linnaei" has appeared yet. His recently published work ["Museum anatomicum"] expensive but demand keeping pace with supply. Still awaiting a letter from Sir Joseph Banks.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
John Latham
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/23/61, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Proposes Dr [Marcus Elieser] Bloch [(1723-1799), physician and naturalist], of Berlin, with whom he has been in correspondence, as a FMLS. Recommends Bloch's work on fish [see RelatedMaterial below]. Bloch has invited him to become member of the Societé des Scrutateurs de la Nature at Berlin. Intends to send him "Linnean Transactions", requests copies of first and second volumes, so as to also send to Dr Walther of Erlang.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edmund Davall
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Feb 1794
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/14/66, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

In a "kind of torpor" and waiting for letter from Smith to reanimate his existence. Aware that Smith's "Sketch of a Tour on the Continent" now published. His last remaining aunt died 31 January of a sudden serious apoplexy at age of 74 and 8 months, having previously been in perfect health. Depressed by his own and his wife's illnesses and threat of invasion by French to his wife and son, and library and herbarium formed at expense of more than a third his patrimony. Asks for Smith's assistance in drawing up plans for a heated greenhouse as no mason or carpenter in his area has an idea of the matter; specifications. Requests copies of Smith's "Tour", volume two of "Linnean Transactions" (1794), and continuation of "English Botany", directions for them to be sent.

Note on left-hand margin of recto of first folio detailing most recent letters received from and sent to Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London