Search: 1800-1809::1809::04 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 19 of 9 items

Text Online
From:
André-Marie Ampère
To:
Pierre Maine de Biran
Date:
15 avril 1809
Source of text:
N.A.F. ms 14605, f° 64-69 [note A. Robinet], Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
From:
Thomas Johnes
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
30 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/16/85, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Received Smith's letter of 24 [April]. An Aberystwyth surgeon has used "cuperose" with great effect to cure a young man's epileptic fits, and will write to him if Lady Amelia Hume wants the medicine. "Great loss" in death of [Thomas] Beddoes [(1760-1808), chemist and physician]. Returns Smith's manuscript and has made only minor corrections, offers plan of the present house [for Smith's "A tour to Hafod" (1810)].

Complains of the "miserable criticism" the "Edinburgh [Review]" of his [Jean de] Joinville [(1224-1317), French chronicler] translation; suspects it was "fabricated here by an ancient supposed friend". Laments "change in men's minds in last year", "they all seem unhinged" and they have "no heads and no leaders".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Antonino Bivona Bernardi
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
30 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/45, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sending two copies of his Botanic pamphlets and some of the plates of Cupani's "Panphyton siculum", touched up by Bonanno. Invites Smith to contribute to the "Sicilian Flora". Refrained from sending specimens as they would have been accompanied by a request for "elucidation". Asks whether the fourth volume of "Flora Britannica" has been published yet.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Furly Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
28 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/35, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Arrangements for the Smiths visit to them in Clapton in a week.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Hardwicke
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/83, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Received Smith's letter of 8 April [1808]. His military duties prevent him from pursuing his natural history interests; does not expect to stay in India for any longer than two years after hopefully taking command of the Artillery-in-the-Field, based at Cawnpore. Thanks for Smith's "Physiology and System of Botany"; believes it will prove a valuable and useful work. [William] Roxburgh working on his book; his arranging of 'Monandria' given extra impetus by [William] Roscoe's paper on same in "Linnean Transactions" vol 8.

Mr Fleming unlikely to leave India this year. Expects [Francis] Buchanan to make considerable additions to ichtyology and ornithology. Hopes Smith's family recovered from their sickness. Criticises the "marauders in the field of science". Compliments to Sir Joseph Banks, [Thomas] Marsham, [Alexander] Macleay, and [William George] Maton. Encloses memoranda from Dr [William] Hunter [see RelatedMaterial below].

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
S W Turner
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
16 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/26/31, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

He and a friend have resolved to establish a botanic garden here; requests exotic seeds from Smith. Intends to visit the Liverpool botanic garden. Offers to translate review of Smith's "Introduction to Botany" in Schrader's journal. Asks after possibility of procuring Willdenow's edition of Linnaeus' "Species plantarum".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Hugh Davies
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/4/29, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Cured his rheumatism, which had assumed the form of sciatica by applying a plaster of laurel leaves ('Prunus laurocerasus'). Asks Smith to not spend too much time determining the 'Salix' specimens he sent and makes some of his own observations on them.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edward Smith- Stanley
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
21 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/61, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Did not receive Smith's letter asking him to attend the Carrow Bridge Bill [in the House of Commons] until it was too late [this was a contentious scheme to build a bridge over the River Wensum at Carrow Abbey, near Norwich, for which an Act of Parliament was passed on 31 May 1809]. Apologises for being a "lazy and unprofitable associate of the Linnean Society". Has conclusively proved that 'Picus medius' is not a species and is only the young of 'Picus major'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
George Don
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
3 Apr 1809
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/GD/71, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Still waiting to hear Smith's opinion on those plants he sent himself and via [Charles] Lyell. Numbered observations on enclosed mosses he previously sent to [Dawson] Turner, also without response: 2. [sic] a 'Grimmia', would like to name it after W Symonds, who died in Barbados; 3. a 'Grimmia', proposes name 'G. alpina' or 'G. nivalis'; 4. a 'Hypnum'; 5. another 'Hypnum'.

Numbered observations on enclosed plants: 1. 'Potentilla tridentata' [Smith annotation: "right"]; 2. 'Lychnis alpina' [Smith annotation: "right"]; 3. 'Ranunculus alpestris' [Smith annotation: "right"]; 4. a 'Silene' resembling 'S. alpestris' [Smith annotation: "the 'Silene' will be sent in my next"] ; 5. a 'Crepis' [Smith annotation: "'pulcra' HL"]; 6. 'Cochlearia groenlandica' [Smith annotation: "right HL"]; 7. the true 'Erigeron uniflorum' [Smith annotation: "right!"]; 8. a 'Saxifraga' cultivated for 2 years in strong, rich, wet soil [Smith annotation: "new, the 2 darkest specimens green specimens is cultivated in the wet soil!"]; 9. a 'Cerastium' [Smith annotation: "'Stellaria cerastoides'"]; 10. 'Fontinalis pennata' of Linnaeus [Smith annotation: "'Neckera pumila'"].

Enquires after specimens he sent some years ago as 'Spergula maxima' and 'S. arvensis' [Smith annotation: "both 'arvensis'"].

Two small specimens, labelled "2".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London