Search: Darwin, C. R. in addressee 
1860-1869 in date 
letter in document-type 
No in transcription-available 
Sorted by:

Showing 141160 of 2283 items

From:
Tiberius Cornelius Winkler
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 July 1861
Source of text:
The University of Edinburgh Centre for Research Collections (Gen.117/6084)
Summary:

Sends his article ["Quelques nouvelles espèces de poissons fossiles", Hollandsche Maatschappij der Wetenschappen, Haarlem 2d ser. 14 (1861)]

and Dutch translation of the Origin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hewett Cottrell Watson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 July 1861
Source of text:
DAR 181: 38
Summary:

Distribution of varieties and subspecies.

George Maw’s review of the Origin [Zoologist 19 (1861): 7577–611].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Branwhite Clarke
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[Aug 1861]
Source of text:
DAR 161.2: 171
Summary:

Evidence of glacial action in Australia. [See Origin, 4th ed., p. 443.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
University of Breslau
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
4 Aug 1861
Source of text:
DAR 230: 9
Summary:

CD awarded honorary doctorate of medicine and surgery by the University of Breslau. [See 3194a.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Aug [1861]
Source of text:
DAR 99: 11–12
Summary:

Thanks CD for his letter about GM’s review of the Origin.

Sends instances of correlative organisation and functions which he finds difficult to believe could have accumulated by gradual modifications.

[Letter erroneously dated 1862 by GM.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Henry Walter Bates
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 25 Sept 1861]
Source of text:
DAR 160.3: 63 (fragile)
Summary:

Mention of Volucella.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Rolleston
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
1 Sept 1861
Source of text:
DAR 176: 207
Summary:

The embryology of the vertebrate nervous system may be an exception to the law of inheritance at corresponding ages.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 and 29 Aug 1861 and 2 Sept 1861
Source of text:
DAR 110 (ser. 2): 76
Summary:

Gives some observations on the sensitivity of Drosera species and comments on cases of "dioecio-dimorphism".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Francis Jamieson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Sept 1861
Source of text:
The University of Edinburgh Centre for Research Collections (Lyell collection Coll-203/A3/7: 75–92)
Summary:

Observations from a fortnight in Lochaber. Found the entrance to Loch Treig to present the clearest evidence of intense glacial action. States, in contradiction of David Milne-Home, that there is glacial scoring in Glen Spean, as Louis Agassiz described, and moraine around the mouth of Loch Treig. There is little sign of water erosion on the rocks crossed by the lines in Glen Roy. Believes the smoothed rocks at the eastern end of Loch Laggan are due to flow from the lake and not tidal action. The lines in Glen Roy are too neat for a lake shore subject to tides. Given the glacial scoring sweeping round from Glen Spean into Glen Treig, and all the boulders, TFJ is astonished that anyone could deny that there had been glaciers there. [See 3247.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hewett Cottrell Watson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Sept 1861
Source of text:
DAR 181: 39
Summary:

The Primula experiments of J. Sidebotham; HCW’s distrust of the results [see J. Sidebotham, "Specific identity of the cowslip and the primrose", Phytologist 3 (1849): 703–5].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 Sept 1861
Source of text:
DAR 171.3(1): 331
Summary:

Offers to publish Orchids, giving CD one-half of the profits of each edition.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Obadiah Westwood
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 Sept 1861
Source of text:
DAR 181: 89
Summary:

Has found the reference to Charles Morren’s paper, "On the agency of insects in causing sterility in flowers" [Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1 (1836): xliv–xlv].

Common white butterflies remove pollen-masses with their tarsi from plants of the Asclepiadaceae.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[28 Sept 1861]
Source of text:
DAR 205.4: 98
Summary:

List of Australian plants that have become naturalised in the Nilgiris [India] and are turning out the native trees.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 Sept 1861
Source of text:
The University of Edinburgh Centre for Research Collections (Gen.112/2813-16)
Summary:

Asks for copy of CD’s paper ["Ancient glaciers of Caernarvonshire", Collected papers 1: 163–71]. Gathers that drift of Moel Tryfan is glacial.

Believes Glen Roy roads formed later than submergence of Scotland.

Asks CD’s opinion concerning relative chronology of various glacial deposits, particularly a flint tool find in the Ouse River near Bedford.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Henry Walter Bates
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 Sept 1861
Source of text:
DAR 205.10: 92
Summary:

Discusses the mimicry of the Volucella flies, and the bees and wasps they mimic. Compares it with the different object of mimicry in butterflies.

Refers to incompleteness of Cuthbert Collingwood’s paper [? "On homophormism, or organic representative forms", Proc. Liverpool Lit. & Philos. Soc. 14 (1860): 181–216].

Thanks CD for help in selecting a publisher for his book [The naturalist on the river Amazons (1863)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Daniel Oliver
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 8 Oct 1861]
Source of text:
DAR 261.10: 31
Summary:

Finds no trace of nectar in Stanhopea saccata.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas White Woodbury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[9–22 Oct 1861]
Source of text:
Pinned to CD’s unbound copy of Journal of Horticulture , 8 October 1861, p. 38 (Darwin Library–CUL)
Summary:

Fancies articles on "The queen bee" and "Drone influence" [J. Hortic. 8 October 1861, p. 39] may be of interest. Since writing the latter, one of his drones hybridised a queen at a distance of a mile and a half.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
11 Oct 1861
Source of text:
DAR 109: 82–3, DAR 110 (ser. 2): 117, DAR 111: 83
Summary:

Notes several cases of "dioecio-dimorphism" in different genera; feels the discovery of pollen that will act only on the pistil of another flower is most important. Believes CD should next turn his attention to investigating cases of "precocious fertilisation".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Henry Wenman Newman
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 22 Oct 1861]
Source of text:
Journal of Horticulture, Cottage Gardener, and Country Gentleman n.s. 2 (1861–2): 76–7.
Summary:

Replies to CD’s query (see 3778): the queens or females of the humble bees are not fertilised in the air. Offers a number of observations relating to the fertilisation of bees and wasps, which he has made in the course of sixty years.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 Oct 1861
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections DC AL 7/1)
Summary:

Ice could not have formed the blockages in Lochaber unless in every case the water escaped over some col into a contiguous valley on the same watershed, or into the eastern watershed. Supposes that the cols were not land-straits, but the places where the lakes were drained when forced to flow the wrong way.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project