Search: Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
Wallace, A. R. in correspondent 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 97 items

From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 106: B70–2, DAR 86: A10–11
Summary:

Responds to CD’s queries on polygamy in birds and orang.

Discusses sexual selection and secondary characters; colours and sexual preference.

Expresses his admiration for Pangenesis; it is superior to Herbert Spencer’s theory.

ARW differs somewhat with CD’s chapter on causes of variability [ch. 22 in Variation]. Thinks several of CD’s arguments are unsound.

Briefly discusses how natural selection might aid in producing sterility between allied species.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
4 Oct 1868
Source of text:
DAR 106: B68–69
Summary:

Sexual differences in coloration. Sexual selection versus natural selection as explanations. ARW continues to argue against sexual selection, saying that natural selection, in keeping the female dull for protection, would account for differences in sexual colouring more effectively than inheritance and partial transmission of sexually selected male colours. Colours of female birds of paradise. Protective coloration. Disagrees with CD on coincidence of hidden nests and bright colours of females.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Russel Wallace
Date:
22 July [1875]
Source of text:
DAR 148: 271
Summary:

Glad to hear that ARW is so busy.

CD believes that he has thrown some light on the acquirement of the power of digestion in Droseraceae [in Insectivorous plants].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Russel Wallace
Date:
23 Dec 1875
Source of text:
DAR 148: 272
Summary:

E. R. Lankester has been unfairly blackballed at the Linnean Society. He is to be proposed for a second time, with CD seconding the proposal. Urges ARW to attend the ballot.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Russel Wallace
Date:
17 Nov 1873
Source of text:
DAR 96: 161–2
Summary:

Would be happy if ARW would undertake to help with correcting the proof-sheets of his revised edition of Descent. Outlines the job that would be required.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Russel Wallace
Date:
[18 Nov 1873]
Source of text:
DAR 96: 164
Summary:

CD’s son [George] could do the work [of proof-correction for Descent, 2d ed.] if ARW finds he does not care for it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Russel Wallace
Date:
[21 Mar 1868]
Source of text:
The British Library (Add MS 46434: 119–20); DAR 106: B160–3
Summary:

On problem of sterility, CD cannot persuade himself that it has been gained by natural selection.

On sexual selection and minute variations, he tends to agree with ARW. Sends George Darwin’s notes on ARW’s argument.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Russel Wallace
Date:
14 Apr 1869
Source of text:
The British Library (Add MS 46434: 181–3)
Summary:

ARW’s review of 10th ed. of Lyell’s Principles [see 6684] is admirable.

But he differs "grievously" with ARW on man. CD sees no necessity for an additional and proximate cause.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Russel Wallace
Date:
3 Aug [1872]
Source of text:
Waddington Auction (dealers) (July 1998)
Summary:

Encloses a letter to Nature [see 8448] correcting Dr Bree, who has accused ARW of "blundering". ARW should tear up CD’s letter if he does not like it or plans to reply himself.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 July 1875
Source of text:
DAR 106: B121–2
Summary:

Response to Insectivorous plants. Surprised that CD did not discuss origin of the contrivances. Critics will interpret them as inexplicable by theory of natural selection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Nov 1875
Source of text:
DAR 106: B123
Summary:

Thanks for Climbing plants [2d ed.].

Is reading proofs [of Geographical distribution (1876)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 June 1876
Source of text:
DAR 106: B124
Summary:

Comments on CD’s criticism of Geographical distribution.

Plans to sell his house.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 July 1876
Source of text:
DAR 106: B126–9
Summary:

Responds to CD’s comments and criticism of Geographical distribution.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
13 Dec 1876
Source of text:
DAR 106: B130–1
Summary:

Responds to CD’s new work [Cross and self-fertilisation]. Suggests results might have been more convincing if CD had measured weights instead of heights. The fact that infertile hybrids have not been produced means that the "one great objection" has not been got rid of: the physiological characteristic of species. Suggests an experiment to produce "sterile mongrels" which would remove objection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Jan 1877
Source of text:
DAR 106: B132–3
Summary:

Thanks for new edition of Orchids.

The remarkable papers of Mott on Ernst Haeckel ["On Haeckel’s history of creation", Proc. Lit. & Philos. Soc. Liverpool 31 (1876–7): 41–89].

The part played by carbon in geological changes.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 July 1877
Source of text:
DAR 106: B134–5
Summary:

Thanks CD for Forms of flowers.

Further objections to "voluntary" sexual selection. Believes that he can explain all the phenomena of sexual ornaments and colours by laws of development aided by simple natural selection.

Excited by Thomas Belt’s "oceanic glacier river-damming" hypothesis. The last paper, "Glacial period in the Southern Hemisphere" in the Quarterly Journal of Science is particularly fine.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Sept 1877
Source of text:
DAR 106: B136–7
Summary:

Sexual selection, he thinks, must be left to others to settle. "Conscious" will be substituted for "voluntary" selection. Sound- and scent-producing organs attributed to "natural", not "conscious", selection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 Sept 1878
Source of text:
DAR 106: B138–9
Summary:

Requests support for his appointment as Superintendent of Epping Forest.

Working on a book [Australasia. Stanford’s compendium of geography and travel, edited and extended by A. R. Wallace (1879)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 Sept 1878
Source of text:
DAR 106: B140–1
Summary:

Thanks for CD’s support for [Epping Forest] appointment. Doubts about the proposed management.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
9 Jan 1880
Source of text:
DAR 106: B142–3
Summary:

Gratified by CD’s praise.

Describes plan of his new book [Island life (1880)].

Efforts to secure a post.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail