Search: Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
1860-1869::1863::05 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 6179 of 79 items

From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 91
Summary:

Discusses Darjeeling position. Thanks CD for advice.

Will send orchid paper [see 4087].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Thomas Austen
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 May 1863
Source of text:
DAR 159: 149
Summary:

Has written to G. Dennen to ask him for an explanation regarding his behaviour in a financial transaction involving the savings bank of which JTA and CD are trustees.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Lydia Ernestine Becker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 160: 109
Summary:

Thanks for CD’s paper [not named].

Inquires whether Lychnis, as an hermaphrodite, is more susceptible to fungus, disease, other weaknesses.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 92
Summary:

Sends abstract from Edinburgh Courant of his orchid sterility paper [see 4087]. Balfour altered title to obscure its theoretical nature.

Sends specimens showing curious variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
29 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 195
Summary:

CD’s encouragement of John Scott, who has found a case of self-incompatibility in orchids, like William Herbert’s in Crinum.

Nägeli on phyllotaxy.

CD’s observations on broom fertilisation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Thomas Austen
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
29 May 1863
Source of text:
DAR 159: 150
Summary:

Has not yet received any reply from Dennen.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Darwin Fox
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
29 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 164: 179
Summary:

Recommends that CD visit Dr MacLeod’s [hydropathic] establishment near Ilkley.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Philip Henry Gosse
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 May 1863
Source of text:
DAR 165: 76
Summary:

Asks CD’s help with problem that arose when he tried to impregnate an orchid following CD’s text in Orchids.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Thomas Austen
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 May 1863
Source of text:
DAR 159: 131
Summary:

Sends letter from G. Dennen. GD improperly proposed to a depositor, Percival, to lend his savings at 10% to Dennen’s brother; asks CD whether matter should be brought before bank trustees.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Asa Gray
Date:
31 May [1863]
Source of text:
Gray Herbarium of Harvard University (84)
Summary:

AG’s review of Alphonse de Candolle’s paper [Am. J. Sci. 2d ser. 35 (1863): 430–44] is excellent.

Does not AG consider that orchids oppose Oswald Heer’s view that species arise suddenly by monstrosities?

Infers that AG cannot explain the angles of phyllotaxy; has been looking at Carl Nägeli on the subject.

Reports Gaston de Saporta’s belief that natural selection will ultimately triumph in France.

Is working slowly at Variation.

Reports his observations on the imperfect flowers of Viola and Oxalis.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Higgins
Date:
31 May 1863
Source of text:
Dominic Winter Auctioneers (dealers) (10 April 2019, lot 138)
Summary:

Acknowledges receipt of £235 7s. 9d.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Scott
Date:
31 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 93: B47–8
Summary:

Thanks JS for abstract of orchid sterility paper from Edinburgh Courant. His case of individual sterility will be of highest use to CD. Criticises JS’s writing. Points out weaknesses in the organisation of his argument and the use of inflated, imprecise language.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
15 May 1863
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library: DAR 115: 193, 193b
Summary:

Critical of ARW's understanding of the economy of nature.

Contributor:
Alfred Russel Wallace Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 May 1863
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library: DAR 101: 143-6
Summary:

Hooker states that he will re-read ARW's 1853 book about the Amazon as he doesn't recall it interesting him at all when it was first published.

Contributor:
Alfred Russel Wallace Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
9 May 1863
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library: DAR 115: 192, 192b
Summary:

ARW listed along with Hooker, Huxley, Lubbock and Bates as the "only honest downright "flat-footed" men in all England!!!".

Contributor:
Alfred Russel Wallace Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Isaac Anderson; Isaac Anderson Henry
Date:
2 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 145: 3
Summary:

Convinced length of stamens has no relation to powers of fertilisation in many plants.

Suggests experiments on Pelargonium and Phlox.

Advises about use of microscope.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Isaac Anderson; Isaac Anderson Henry
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 May 1863
Source of text:
DAR 159: 66
Summary:

CD is right on heterostyly in Primula. High praise. Has confirmed it with Primula polyanthus.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Isaac Anderson; Isaac Anderson Henry
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 May 1863
Source of text:
DAR 110: 24
Summary:

Sends sprig of Linum luteum corymbiflorum [?]. CD is right about its being dimorphic.

Will try some odd strawberry crosses this summer.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin; Emma Wedgwood; Emma Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
[4 May 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 219.1: 55
Summary:

Glad to hear of the plant; CD instructs WED to make further observations. If it is a good case he will insist on WED’s sending a communication to the Linnean Society.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project