Search: 1860-1869::1860::07 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 92 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Falconer
Date:
12 July [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 144: 23
Summary:

Eldest daughter [Henrietta] very ill.

CD enjoys Owen’s having had "a good setting down".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Emma Gärtner
Date:
14 July [1860]
Source of text:
Department of Special Collections, Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas (KU MSS P87: 1)
Summary:

Thanks for memoir of her father [G. Jäger, Zum Andenken an Dr. C. F. von Gärtner (1851)] and engravings.

Declines gift of CFvG’s collection of hybrid plants. Suggests Kew Herbarium.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Heinrich Georg Bronn
Date:
14 July [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 143: 151
Summary:

Responds to HGB’s critique of Origin [appended to German translation of Origin]. Comments on English reviews.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
16 July [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A74–5
Summary:

Discusses Charles Daubeny’s views on sexuality of plants [Rep. BAAS 30 (1860) pt 2: 109–10]. "There is no greater mystery in the whole world, as it seems to me, than the existence of sexes, – more especially since the discovery of Parthenogenesis."

Says apropos of the FitzRoy Bible incident [at Oxford BAAS meeting], "I think his mind is often on verge of insanity."

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Giles Bridle Daubeny
Date:
16 July [1860]
Source of text:
Magdalen College, Oxford (MC:F26/C1/118)
Summary:

Confirms CGBD’s impression given in a letter to J. S. Henslow that CD in the Origin did not touch directly upon the final causes of sexuality, which CD considers one of the "profoundest mysteries in nature". CD is inclined to stress sexuality as the means of keeping forms constant and checking variation although he grants its role in the origination of varieties. [See 2869.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Brodie Innes
Date:
18 July [1860]
Source of text:
Cleveland Health Sciences Library (Robert M. Stecher collection)
Summary:

Henrietta’s illness.

CD’s resort to [E. W. Lane’s] water-cure.

Other family news.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
19 [July 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 68
Summary:

Asa Gray’s anonymous review.

"Intensely interested" in orchid homologies; like a "game of chess".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
Date:
20 July [1860]
Source of text:
Archives of the New York Botanical Garden (Charles Finney Cox Collection)
Summary:

Asks whether crossing breeds of hive-bees is advantageous

and whether different pigeon breeds have different incubation periods.

Explains and apologises for the lack of detailed quotations in Origin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
20 July [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 125)
Summary:

On the Fraser’s Magazine review by Hopkins [see 2860] and the Quarterly Review article by Wilberforce ["Darwin’s Origin of species", 108 (1860): 225–64]. The course of opinion since Oxford BAAS meeting. Asa Gray.

Need for Natural History Review, but fears it will be a burden for THH and lessen his original work. His own problem with work: if he had other duties he would be able to do absolutely nothing in science.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
Date:
20 July [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 263: 40a (EH 88206447)
Summary:

Is puzzled what to think about the [Natural History] Review. Doubts that it is wise that JL and Huxley should give up time to it: "if it would stop your doing original work you ought not, even pro bono publico, undertake the new work".

Reports on Henrietta’s health.

The Quarterly Review [108 (1860): 255–64] quizzes CD "capitally" and he read it with thorough enjoyment.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
[20? July 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 33a
Summary:

CD’s reaction to review of the Origin [by Samuel Wilberforce] in Quarterly Review [see 2881].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Asa Gray
Date:
22 July [1860]
Source of text:
Gray Herbarium of Harvard University (30)
Summary:

Greatly praises AG’s discussion of Origin in Proc. Am. Acad. Arts & Sci. [4 (1860): 411–15; 424–6].

Mentions other reviews of Origin; believes the BAAS meeting at Oxford greatly advanced the subject. Has heard his views are gaining ground in Germany.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Hardy
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 July 1860
Source of text:
DAR 76 (ser. 2): 170
Summary:

CD mistaken, in Origin, p. 73, in saying that only humble-bees visit red clover.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
[17 July 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 69
Summary:

Asa Gray’s articles in Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences [10 Apr 1860] excellent; considering asking Athenæum to reprint them.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Hardy
Date:
27 July [1860]
Source of text:
Smithsonian Libraries and Archives (Dibner Library of the History of Science and Technology MSS 405 A. Gift of the Burndy Library)
Summary:

Thanks CH for correction of blunder in Origin about hive-bees sucking clover: "a greater kindness than a new fact".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
29 July [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 70
Summary:

Casual observations on Drosera.

Wants to know author of good review of Origin in London Review [& Wkly J. Polit. 1 (1860): 11–12, 32–3, 58–9].

Athenæum will reprint Gray’s discussion.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
Date:
30 July [1860]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.222)
Summary:

Comments on BAAS meeting: "our side seems to have got on very well". Asa Gray, too, is fighting nobly.

Comments on review [by Samuel Wilberforce] in the Quarterly [Rev. 108 (1860): 225–64].

Mentions a favourable review in the London Review.

Wonders if German translation [of the Origin] by Bronn has drawn attention to the subject.

The Natural History Review to be edited by Huxley and others.

Expects CL’s book [Antiquity of man (1863)] to be a bombshell.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
James Dwight Dana
Date:
30 July [1860]
Source of text:
Yale University Library: Manuscripts and Archives (Dana Family Papers (MS 164) Series 1, Box 2, folder 44)
Summary:

Has been able to do nothing in science of late due to illness [of Henrietta].

When JDD reads Origin, CD knows he will be opposed to it, but he will be liberal and philosophical, which is more than he can say for his English opponents.

Has not yet seen L. Agassiz’s attack, but in principle avoids answering.

No one understands Origin so well as Asa Gray.

At BAAS meeting at Oxford, CD’s side seems almost to have got the best of the battle.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
Date:
30 July [1860]
Source of text:
Archives of the New York Botanical Garden (Charles Finney Cox Collection)
Summary:

Thanks for information on pigeon hatching

and on drones.

Believes occasional crosses indispensable.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Frederick Watkins
Date:
30 July [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 148: 293
Summary:

Though his book [Origin] has been abused and criticised as well as praised, its effect on good workers in science convinces him that in the main he is on the right road.

In reply to FW’s question, CD says his [CD’s] arguments are valid that all animals are descended from four or five primordial forms; analogy and weak reasons go to show they have descended from some single prototype.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project