From Charles Hardy1   23 July 1860

Hayling Vicarage | Havant

23 July 1860.

Sir,

I venture to mention to you in connexion with a remark made by you at p. 73 of your “Origin of Species” that “humble bees alone visit the red clover (Trifolium pratense) as other bees cannot reach the nectar”—that I was at Bury near Arundel last year in the months of July August & September. There was a field of red clover at the back of the house which was always frequented by myriads of bees.2 Speaking moderately I think a single dash of the net in any part of the field would have taken fifty of them. I called the attention of my children to the fact as contradicting what I told them was a popular error—which circumstance they perfectly recollect. I have repeatedly observed the same thing at other times & in other places.

I ought to say that the clover in question was a second growth (& I believe that it is from the second growth exclusively that the seed is saved) & that the flowers are somewhat smaller than those produced by a first growth. I have never particularly observed whether the latter are equally frequented by bees. If my life is spared for another year I will endeavour to ascertain that point.

I remain Sir | faithfully yours | Charles Hardy.

C. Darwin Esqre.

CD annotations

Top of letter: ‘For Origin | goodink; ‘Ch. 3’3 brown crayon
Hardy was vicar of North and South Hayling, Hampshire.
Hardy apparently means that he saw hive-bees sucking at the clover. In Origin, pp. 94–5, CD stated that hive-bees could not reach into the corolla of the red clover, whereas humble-bees could.
See following letter. CD’s annotation ‘Ch. 3’ refers to the third chapter, ‘On the possibility of all organic beings crossing’, of his ‘big book’ on species (see Natural selection, pp. 56, 68).

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-2877,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-2877