Search: Hooker, J. D. in addressee 
Hooker, J. D. in correspondent 
1860-1869::1860::04 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 17 of 7 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
13 [Apr 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 48
Summary:

Sends a letter concerning priority [of Patrick Matthew] for JDH to read and post.

Angered at Owen’s review.

Huxley’s Royal Institution lecture ends well.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
J. S. Henslow
To:
J. D. Hooker
Date:
14 April 1860
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library Add 9537.2.16
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
18 [Apr 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 49
Summary:

What a base dog Owen is for praising his own work in reviewing Origin [anonymously].

J. H. Balfour is narrow-minded.

CD cannot understand pollination of Goodenia.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
26 Apr [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 50
Summary:

CD intrigued by the pollination mechanism of Leschenaultia formosa.

CD interested in Thomas Bell’s rumour that Owen avows his review.

Curved styles and their relation to pollination.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
J. S. Henslow
To:
J. D. Hooker
Date:
27 April 1860
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library Add 9537.2.15
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
27 Apr [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 261.10: 67 (EH 88206050)
Summary:

Sends list of plants with asymmetry in nectar-secreting surfaces and pistils bent in that direction. Shows insect agency so important that structure has changed. Asks for contrary or confirming examples and that request be passed on to Daniel Oliver.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
30 Apr [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 51
Summary:

JDH has settled the Leschenaultia case, but it remains a difficulty to CD.

Goodenia, like bee orchid, seems a case of a structure with an evident function, which is not carried out. Is curvature of styles an incidental result of growth or a pollination adaptation?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail