Search: 1810-1819::1816 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 239 items

From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
23 Jan 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/16, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Confirms that the election is open rather than his previous assumption that the heads of the colleges named two out of the candidates. Experience of his own election. Ready to resign in Smith's favour, advises Smith on how to proceed from this point, advising him to begin canvassing in London to use his popularity there. Received letters from [Richard] Relhan but not in relation to professorship.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir Thomas Frankland
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Jan 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/15/52, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Received Smith's letter and "curious melon seed"; currently his preferred variety is the green fleshed Egyptian melon. His family: son at Brussels, Lady Frankland confined by paralytic stroke since 20 October, and his brother become incurably blind.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Alexander Macleay
Date:
26 Jan 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/AM/100, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Arrangements for [John Russell, 6th] Duke of Bedford's first attendance at Linnean Society. His opinion of [John] Murray of Stranraer, [Scotland]; no claim to be FLS except on strength of his paper on vegetable poisons, he is "an itinerant lecturer", as [Richard] Salisbury once called [Smith]. "Far more sorry than surprised" regarding [Thomas] Marsham's financial troubles, asks Macleay to reassure Marsham of his continuing regard for him. Satisfied with title "Institutor".

Intends to have [Thomas] Martyn resign the [Cambridge botany] professorship in April, erroneous reports of Martyn's death have helped his cause; lists supporters. [William] Kirby intends to oppose him only as he [Smith] is a dissenter and not of the university; his low opinion of Kirby.

They have heard nothing of Miss Fanny Smith's intended marriage.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Samuel Goodenough
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
29 Jan 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/12/17, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sorry to receive Smith's confirmation of the report that [Thomas] Marsham had appropriated £600 of funds from the Linnean Society for his own use. The report was first brought to him by [Aylmer Bourke] Lambert, who received it from [William Elford] Leach, and after questioning Leach learns that the loss is not as great as £600 and Marsham has since paid £300 for renewing the lease of the Society's building. Goodenough proposes a fundraising subscription to save the Society and a "great entrenchment of finances", starting with employing an additional person to justify [Robert] Brown's excessive salary for eight hours of attendance a week as librarian. Laments Smith's absence as Lambert does not have the experience to deal with the situation.

In a postscript Goodenough writes that Marsham's son attended a Council called to discuss the matter, and said that the money would be forthcoming; confusion over whether Marsham had resigned as Treasurer. Goodenough refused [William] Kirby's canvassing letter.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Aylmer Bourke Lambert
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
1 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/6/86, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for turkey. [Augustin Pyramus] de Candolle is in England and intends to visit Smith. Asks if Smith has seen [Edward Daniel] Clarke's new volume and Beeston's "account of St Helena". Professor [Christen] Smith [(1785-1816)] of Christiana returned from an eight month expedition to Canary Islands, has given Lambert duplicates of his whole collection, includes a 'Pinus' similar to 'Pinus pinaster', describes differences, mentioned in [Alexander von] Humboldt's first volume of "Travels". Recently stayed at Lord Blandford's [George Spencer-Churchill], his home Whiteknights, [Reading, Berkshire], the "1st of the kind in Europe".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Johnes
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
1 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/16/101, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for Smith's letter of 13 [January]. Just recovered from severe cough and inflammation on the lungs, the same as last year which Mr Williams "wilfully" misdiagnosed. Surprised and upset by failure of [William] Roscoe's bank [Roscoe was a partner in the Clarke family bank, which failed in 1816]. Fears the country is in a "miserable state" and does not know what can be done to pay the nation's creditors. He has no rents and farms thrown "on hand", wishes that [Thomas William] Coke's tenant who "set a notable example of calling out his landlord" had been "more severely punished". Would be happy to see Smith's friend Mr Lane at Lympstone, [Devon].

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Alexander Macleay
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
2 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/AM/101, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

"Greatly surprised" to hear that [William] Kirby had put himself forward as a candidate for the [Cambridge] botanical professorship but believes he only did so as he thought the university's "shameful objection" to Smith would be fatal to Smith's cause, and thinks Smith wrong to charge him of hypocrisy. His opinion of Smith's chances and controversy surrounding him.

Recently discovered that the signature of the president is necessary before the Linnean Society seal can be affixed to anything; sends power of attorney for Smith to sign.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Alexander Macleay
Date:
4 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/AM/102, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

[William] Kirby acting contrary to Macleay's claimed reasons for his running for [Cambridge botany professorship]; he has the character of a priest, "in the bad sense, [...] essentially composed of hypocrisy & bigottry", which he distinguishes from a "Christian Divine, of whatever church or denomination". Discusses his own chances for Cambridge; has only to "try the fate of the election"; support pledged by Dean of Norwich [Joseph Turner (c 1746-1828)], Bishop of Bristol [William Lort Mansel], and "many other most orthodox clergy".

Comments on "sad event at Liverpool to poor [William] Roscoe" [whose bank failed].

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
John Russell
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/19, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Informs Smith of Lord Hardwicke's [Philip Yorke, 3rd Earl of Hardwicke (1757-1834)] support of his Cambridge candidature. Sinclair and Russell's "Hortus Gramineus Woburnensis" in the press. Recently met [Augustin Pyramys] de Candol[l]e, who is coming to Norwich and recommends Smith also meeting him

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/17, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Erroneous reports of his death in Norwich and London papers have initiated canvassing at Cambridge. [Richard] Relhan has urged Martyn to vacate Walkerian lectureship, details of Relhan's canvassing.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
William Lort Mansel
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/39, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Has heard little of the professorship since [Thomas] Martyn's "reviviscene" [Martyn had been prematurely reported as dead in Norwich and London papers]. Lists Smith's competitors: [Richard] Relhan; two members of Jesus College; and two Linnean Society members, Powell and Pryne. Powell has given notice of reading lectures in agriculture this term. Smith's status as a dissenter has been mentioned several times as an impediment to his election. Promises to support Smith should Relhan give up.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
William Roscoe
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
6 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/102, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for Smith's sympathy [on failure of his banking house]; speculates causes including the great employment of capital following the opening of the American trade and immense exports of Liverpool merchants, most of whom kept their accounts with them, although though most direct and immediate cause was from the least expected quarter [unspecified]. Confident that his and his partners' property will cover all debts and leave a disposable income for themselves and consoles himself with the thought of being freed from his many obligations. Was unaware that [Thomas William] Coke, Lord Derby [Edward Smith-Stanley], and others had been applied to. His family bear it well.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Charles Babbage
Date:
[7 February 1816]
Source of text:
RS:HS 2.55 (C: RS:HS 20.32)
Summary:

Is sorry that CB's paper could not be printed in the recent issue of the R.S.P.T. Discusses problem in analysis. [Note dated [1816-]2-7]: has been waiting for Mr. Deighton's estimate of printing.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
James Grahame
To:
Sir John Herschel
Date:
[8 February 1816]
Source of text:
RS:HS 8.271
Summary:

JG's wife recovering from serious illness; JG writing on population.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
Text Online
From:
Frédéric Maurice (baron)
To:
André-Marie Ampère
Date:
9 février 1816
Source of text:
Correspondance du Grand Ampère (Paris: 1936), p. 507-508.
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
La Correspondance d’André-Marie Ampère
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Benjamin Abbott
Date:
9 February 1816
Source of text:
IEE MS SC 123
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
From:
Christian von Steven
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
10 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/70, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sends Marschall von Bieberstein's "Fl. Taurico-Caucasica"; sends specimens; asks for confirmation of determinations (marked by Smith in margin, "Right"); asks for duplicates (marked by Smith "sent packet of Botanical Bay plants and my Compendn, ed, 2").

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Martin Davy
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
11 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/40, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. [Premature] report of [Thomas] Martyn's death caused the college heads to debate mode for electing a successor to the professorship, it was decided that the appointment is responsibility of the Crown and the university cannot interfere with any appointment. Urgently advises Smith to apply to the government and secure their nomination. Confirms that the only election in the university will be for Walker's lectureship at the Botanic Garden. Recommends Smith immediately enter himself at Pembroke or Trinity college.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Sir Thomas Gery Cullum
Date:
11 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/13/40, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Was surprised not to hear anything from Cullum during "the great stir" caused by [Thomas] Martyn's [erroneously reported] death; certain it has not damaged his campaign for the Cambridge botany professorship. The Duke of Bedford [John Russell, 6th Duke], Lord Hardwicke [Philip Yorke, 3rd Earl of Hardwicke (1757-1834)], Lord Spencer [George John Spencer, 2nd Earl Spencer], [Viscount] Althorp [John Charles Spencer (1782-1845)], [Marquess of] Tavistock [Francis Russell (1788-1861)], [Lord] John Thynne [(1772-1849)], Dean of Lincoln [George Gordon] and others have all come out in support of Smith. Will canvas at Cambridge for a week with Dr [Martin] Davy, and if the conditions are right and the vice-chancellor approves will ask Martyn to resign the professorship and hold the election. Edward [Hall] Alderson [(1787-1857)] of the Temple has a committee sitting for him. Will or has recently seen [William] Webb and [William] Kirby. Both the Bishop of Bristol [William Mansel] and Lord John Thynne convinced Smith will succeed. Plans to be at Linnean Society on 2 April to admit the Duke of Bedford a FLS.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Robert Walpole
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
12 Feb [1816]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/10/60, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Discussion of a plant used for stupefying fish and its use by ancient Greeks and Romans. The plant has the modern name 'Euphorbia characias' and 'Verbascum sinuatum'. [John] Sibthorp said that 'Mercurialis annua' is now used for catching 'Scarus'. A further reference in memoirs of the French Institute on the fishing of the "ancients". A long extract from "His. Plan. IX.c.10", in French. Asks Smith's opinion on this, and the use of '[H]ellebore'. Sibthorp says the three plants with this quality are 'Conium maculatum ', 'Euphorbia characias', and 'Verbascum sinuatum', asks Smith to add the modern name 'Cyclamen'. Transcribes account of a herb being used to gather fish, sent by a friend travelling in Greece.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London