Search: 1870-1879::1872::07 in date 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 25 items

From:
[–] von Gloeden
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
1 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 165: 57
Summary:

Comments on Descent.

Attempts to explain differing sex ratios in births from illegitimate unions, Jewish marriages, and Christian marriages.

Speculates on role of male and female elements in conception.

Thinks survival of individual conflicts in some degree with survival of species; for example, hybrids often live longer than fertile individuals.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Denny
Date:
9 July 1872
Source of text:
University of Otago Library, Special Collections (DeB MS 55)
Summary:

Has read JD’s articles in the Gardeners’ Chronicle [(1872): 872, 904–5].

Questions him on the fertility of certain varieties of Pelargonium which are fertile with some varieties but infertile with others.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Leonard Darwin
Date:
11 July [1872]
Source of text:
DAR 153: 90
Summary:

CD wants no more alterations than are necessary [to proofs of Expression]. Warns LD that "any alteration seems at first an improvement".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Denny
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 162: 159
Summary:

Replies to CD’s queries. Duke of Cornwall Pelargonium is fertile with its own pollen. Has failed to produce hybrids from other varieties besides P. peltatum and P. elegans. Sends numbers of the Florist which contain an account of his mode of procedure ["On cross-breeding pelargoniums" Florist & Pomologist (1872): 10, 34, 50].

Reports a confirmation of his theory of the prepotence of the male parent.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
12 July [1872]
Source of text:
DAR 94: 222–3
Summary:

Overjoyed at the way the newspapers have taken up JDH’s case. The memorial has done great good this way, whatever the wretched Government does. It is enough to make one a Tory. JDH has done a service to all men of science by showing governments that they cannot be trampled on.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Darwin Fox
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
13 July [1872]
Source of text:
DAR 164: 195
Summary:

Will not pass through London, so will not be able to call at Down.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Julius Victor Carus
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 161: 82
Summary:

Asks whether he can start soon on translating Expression.

Thinks CD has gone a little too far on St G. J. Mivart’s objection, which he thinks did very little harm in Germany.

JVC’s history of zoology is finished [Geschichte der Zoologie bis auf Joh. Müller und Charl. Darwin (1872)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Denny
Date:
14 July [1872]
Source of text:
DAR 96: 114–15
Summary:

Discusses JD’s crossing experiments with Pelargonium; notes that his conclusions on male prepotence oppose those of Gärtner. Suggests that his observations on differences in fertility of certain varieties of Pelargonium crossed with certain other varieties be communicated to the Linnean Society.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Frans Cornelis (Franciscus Cornelius) Donders
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 162: 233
Summary:

Thanks CD for invitation but declines because of his need for a rest instead of coming to England in July.

Repeats his offer to help CD at any time. "I am always learning by trying to answer your questions."

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hubert Airy
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 15] July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 159: 16
Summary:

Outlines his theory on the origin of existing orders of leaf arrangement. Believes spiral and whorled orders have evolved from a primitive distichous arrangement. These arrangements permit a compact bud form of small surface area that can withstand external changes in temperature, and in particular can tolerate frost.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Hubert Airy
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 159: 17
Summary:

Thanks CD for reading his MS [8412] and for his suggestions.

Clarifies his statement on the contraction of the bud-axis: did not mean to imply that this contraction occurred in an individual’s life-time, rather that it was the effect, after the course of ages, of successive favourable modifications.

Believes the true theory of phyllotaxy will give a convincing illustration and proof of the theory of evolution.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Francis Ellingwood Abbot
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 159: 4
Summary:

Thanks CD for five dollars and two-year subscription to Index, and for permission to quote CD’s compliments on Truths for the times.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Hubert Airy
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 159: 18
Summary:

Discusses the significance of the node. Believes, with CD, that it has no independent importance but is merely the consequence of the presence of a leaf. Does not believe a distinction can be made between whorled and alternate leaf arrangements on the basis of the number of leaves springing from a node. The node, as the starting point of a leaf, is subject to any disarrangement which takes place among the leaves.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Loring Brace
Date:
20 July [1872]
Source of text:
DAR 143: 142
Summary:

Comments on Brace’s work [The dangerous classes of New York (1872)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Denny
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 162: 160
Summary:

Thanks CD for his offer to communicate the results of his experiments with Pelargonium to the Linnean Society. Prefers to continue experimenting for at least another season before doing so.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hubert Airy
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 159: 19
Summary:

Corrects a factual error in his previous letter [8418].

Sends specimens illustrative of the "nodal" question.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Jean Louis Armand (Armand de Quatrefages) Quatrefages de Bréau
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 175: 10
Summary:

CD not nominated by French Academy.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hubert Airy
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 159: 20
Summary:

Responds to CD’s comments on his MS on phyllotaxy.

The initial variation required by his theory would be a slight twist of the bud-axis; believes the frequent twisting of stems and branches renders such a variation possible.

Admits he placed too much emphasis on the importance of frost. He should have spoken more generally of "vicissitudes of climate".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Leonard Darwin
Date:
26 July [1872]
Source of text:
DAR 153: 90
Summary:

CD cannot improve style [of Expression] without great changes. "I am sick of the subject, and myself, and the world".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Robert Francis Cooke; John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 July 1872
Source of text:
DAR 171: 410
Summary:

Foreign translations, illustrations, and other arrangements for Expression. Foreign publishers must be bound not to publish before the English edition is out.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project