No summary available.
No summary available.
No summary available.
Comments on MS of JL’s [1881] BAAS Presidential Address. Suggests that more attention be given to parthenogenesis.
Obliged for the shrub "Australian Sheep" [Raoulia eximia] and pleased to have seen MN’s Australian pictures. Can still recall scenes from various countries with vividness.
Repeats request for loan in order to spend probationary training period in chemical factory.
CD wants to see TLB before he leaves London. Much obliged for his aid.
Reports on a luncheon of scientific savants at which the Crown Prince of Germany [and Prince of Wales?] were present.
No summary available.
Outlines address to York BAAS meeting on history of geographical distribution. Organising theme: advancement in this science based on ideas enunciated by scientific voyagers. Asks CD’s advice.
Acknowledges receipt of parcel of colours and chemical reagents.
Quotes CD’s "horrid doubt" [see 13230]. WG fails to see force of the argument. Evolution throws no suspicion on man’s reasoning faculties. The case is no different with the faculty that gives data.
Thanks him for his letter. "I am not a quick thinker or a good talker and you would learn nothing from me on the many important subjects you have discussed."
Suggests meeting in London in lieu of a visit to Down.
CD does not lend money, but he encloses a cheque as a present.
AD’s son has inherited the same head malformation as one AD had received as a result of the pressure of his nurse’s arm while carrying him when a baby.
Responds to JDH’s outline history of plant geography.
Considers Humboldt the "greatest scientific traveller who ever lived".
Discusses the origin and rapid radiation of angiosperms in Cretaceous period.
Comments on importance of work of Alphonse de Candolle, Saporta, Axel Blytt.
Asks the printers that the table of contents [for Earthworms] be done in the same fashion used in his other books. Requests another proof.
No summary available.
Encloses notice about Wilhelm Roux’s book [see 13118].
Comments on John Collier’s portrait.
AD’s case is a "curious one"; it seems impossible to explain as accidental coincidence.
[Letter sent in error to Raphael Meldola and apparently never forwarded to AD.]
Requests name of the publishers of RM’s translation of Weismann’s Studien.