Search: letter in document-type 
Stainton, H. T. in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 27 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
20 Oct [1855]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 15)
Summary:

Would be useless to insert CD’s name [on masthead of Entomologists’ Annual] since he does not work on insects.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
13 Apr [1856]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 16)
Summary:

Thanks HTS for Entomologist’s Weekly Intelligencer [no. 2, 12 Apr 1856]. Agrees with his remarks [in "Why did Mr Westwood get the Royal Medal?"], but explains that a change in rules for awarding the Royal Medal has been made. Earlier it had to be given for publications in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, which explains small number of entomologist recipients.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
10 June 1856
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 328
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
11 July 1856
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 329
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
22 December 1856
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 331
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
24 December 1856
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 332
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
26 December 1856
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 333
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
16 January 1858
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 334
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
4 March 1859
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 335
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
8 March 1859
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 336
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
22 April 1859
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 337
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
2 July 1859
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 338
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
5 September 1859
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 339
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
28 September 1859
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 340
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
11 June [1860]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 17)
Summary:

On what kind of moth have pollen-masses of orchids been found cohering? Will ask Mr Parfitt if he is certain he recognised pollen-masses of bee orchid. CD thinks green masses were those of true Orchis.

[In P.S., having received a letter on subject from HTS responding to same query published in Gard. Chron. 9 June 1860:] It is extremely curious that the same moth has been found with pollen-masses in two parts of England.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
20 June [1860]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 18)
Summary:

Has had a very satisfactory answer from Mr Parfitt. Asks HTS to insert query in Entomologist’s Weekly Intelligencer and also to answer it himself. ["Do the Tineina and other small moths suck flowers?", Collected papers 2: 35–6.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
H. T. Stainton
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
17 December 1860
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 330
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
18 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 20)
Summary:

Asks for information on coloration and proportions of sexes in butterflies and moths for his work on sexual selection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A6–7
Summary:

Sends a preliminary reply to CD’s query [5890]. Ten males to one female among captured micro-Lepidoptera. Six females to four or five males in those he has bred. HTS is aware this is diametrically opposed to information from [Alexander] Wallace and Bates, but the true proportion of sexes can only be ascertained by breeding.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
21 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 21)
Summary:

Discusses factors possibly influencing the sex of caterpillars. Is gathering information on sex ratios in insects and would welcome any cases in which males seem to outnumber females.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project