From J. W. Strutt to G. H. Darwin [19 June 1879]

\Terling Place. | Witham. | Essex

Thursday

My dear Darwin

I believe pure copper (electrolysed) can be had, but perhaps even then diamagnetism might interfere. You could take two precautions against it, (1) by working in the position that diamagnetism alone wd. tend to give, (2) by measuring the current wh produces the field (easily done), & having it always the same. But perhaps for such great delicacy this might not be enough. However I should fear still greater disturbances from a liquid as you proposed. I am not clear that you ought to have any damping at all. If the oscillations are slow enough, the extreme excursions can be read, & contain all the information there is to be had. If you use damping, preliminary expts will be necessary to try different ways. There would be no harm in using a copper bob anyhow, & ther is no need to turn on the Electricity, even if you can do so. I have had no experience of Electric damping, & so my views are not worth much.

Yours very truly | Rayleigh

Please cite as “FL-1242,” in Ɛpsilon: The Darwin Family Letters Collection accessed on 2 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/darwin-family-letters/letters/FL-1242