Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.
Feb. 26th./75
Dear G.
I have just got your letter forwarded on here. If you dont want these P.Cs. I should like to keep them, as the seem to work well. & were a great deal of trouble to make. As you still do’nt answer my question about the original thing about inverting force with a P.C. (i.e. if you made a spring with force & as sq. of distance to get from the spring & P.C. a force varing inversely as square of distance), I suppose you are wrong; but I cannot think why you should mind saying so.
[DIAG HERE]
It still seems to me that you are wrong if I understand you construction right, viz. a knitting needle going through two rings at A. & B.. & string going round it & fastened to R & to other end a weight
Now the calculation you send me is what I have done & get the same result. when there is simply a force acting at P. & sent it you.
But it seems to me that you have left out the reaction of the knitting kneedle at A & B. Is this so or is it not. Please answer me this.
H Darwin
Status: Draft transcription
This transcript was produced as a side-product of the work of the Darwin Correspondence Project and may not have been proofread to the DCP’s usual standards.
Please cite as “FL-1386,” in Ɛpsilon: The Darwin Family Letters Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/darwin-family-letters/letters/FL-1386