1 Pier Road. Erith
Thursday
Dear G
It seems to me when you were talking of inverting force by a cell you were talking bosh; the following seems to me the only way of using a cell with force wh. is possible, & it does not invert.
Let P be the poles of a cell
f a force acting at P
f′ . . . . . . . . . . . . . P′
[DIAG HERE]
oP=r
oP′ = r′ ∴ rr′ = cont.
= k suppose
Suppose the cell to move a little so that r becomes r+dr , & r′ becomes r‘+dr‘
Then by virtual velocities
fdr = f′dr′
and r‘dr = –rdr′ ∴ dr =–dr′
∴ fdr′ = f′dr′
-f = f′
∴ –fr = f′r′
–f rr′ = f′r′2
f = –
Hence if f is a constant f′ varies as the square of its distance from o.
If you can invert this by another cell the thing is done; but I don’t think it would work practically.
I get a problem from this.
A body is moving in an orbit round a central force wh. varies as the square of the distance; if R & R′ be the distance of the body from the force at any two pts of the orbit, the amount of energy (kinetic & potential) lost, of gained, by the body in moving from one of these pts to the other, will vary as –
This is done at once by the cell.
Suppose we make our force varying as square of the distance by a cell, with a constant force acting at one of the poles (P) and the body at the other (P′)
Referring to old picture
work done in moving from one pt. to another
= f . Δ r = k f Δ ()
where Δ r = change in length of r
H Darwin
[DIAG HERE]
Status: Draft transcription
This transcript was produced as a side-product of the work of the Darwin Correspondence Project and may not have been proofread to the DCP’s usual standards.
Please cite as “FL-1387,” in Ɛpsilon: The Darwin Family Letters Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/darwin-family-letters/letters/FL-1387