To ?1   [after 11 December 1875]2

My dear Sir—

You have always shown so friendly a feeling towards me, that I have thought that you wd excuse me for writing to you on a subject which deeply interests me. I heard on Saturday that R. L. had been black-balled at the Linnean Soc.—3 I did not even know that he was a candidate; & my personal acquaintance with him is slight, having seen him only on a single occasion.4 But I have read many of his papers on Embryology5 &c & have seen the way in which he is spoken of by foreigners. Therefore I cannot doubt that as far as his scientific claims are concerned, he ought to have been elected.— I therefore agree most willingly to second, a new proposal, which is to be immediately suspended.—6

I am told on good authority that the reason of his being blackballed is that the Council intended to remit his fees.7

I know not & care not whether the Council was justified in their intention from some accounts which I have received it seems quite unjustifiable, from other accounts justifiable; But if they did wrong they ought to have been called to account & severely blamed at the anniversary or at a special meeting. (& which would be I think better to have later for other [illeg] Now what I earnestly beg you to do is to put yourself in [imagination] in the position of R. L, Suppose that you as a young man had done some good work & had been proposed for the Linnean Soc., & that the Council wished to remit, the fees, but that some person thought this was a very improper proceeding on their part; how could you not have thought yourself cruelly treated if you as an upright & honourable man had been blackballed on this account, & a stigma thus cast on you for the rest of your life; for it will be said of R. L “oh he was blackballed at the Linnean, & no one else has been for the last 50 years.”.— I feel this so strongly on this head, that I wd do almost anything to get him (though not my personal friend), elected by a large majority; & I further believe that such blackballing is enough to half ruin the Linn. Soc.— I have lately proposed one of my sons & Mr Romanes, & had this blackballing occurred earlier, I shd have doubted much before doing so.8 I beg you to have the [illeg] to let me hear from you, whether my argument has any weight on your mind, & in any case I trust that you will forgive me for troubling you. as I am [myself] concerned in the case [from being] agreed to second Dr Lankester on his second candidature

The recipient is not indicated on the draft, but it is possible that it was George James Allman, who was president of the Linnean Society. The draft might also have served as the basis of all the letters CD wrote in support of Edwin Ray Lankester’s second nomination for fellowship of the society (see, for example, letter to J. J. Weir, 18 December [1875]).
The month and year are established by the reference to the blackballing of Edwin Ray Lankester (see n. 3, below); the day is conjectured from CD having heard the news on Saturday 11 December (see letter to J. D. Hooker, [12 December 1875] and n. 2]).
CD heard from Joseph Dalton Hooker that Lankester had been blackballed at a meeting of the Linnean Society on 2 December 1875 (letter to J. D. Hooker, 2 December 1875).
Lankester had visited CD at Down on 18 July 1875 (Emma Darwin’s diary (DAR 242)).
Lankester had published a large number of papers by 1875. CD had been impressed by his writing since 1869 (see Correspondence vol. 17, letter to E. R. Lankester, 25 June 1869).
CD agreed to second Thomas Henry Huxley’s proposal that Lankester be put forward for election a second time (see letter to J. J. Weir, 18 December [1875] and n. 5); he had met Huxley on 12 December 1875 (Emma Darwin’s diary (DAR 242)). Proposals of fellows for election to the Linnean Society were suspended in the society in advance of the election meeting.
Francis Darwin and George John Romanes were elected fellows of the Linnean Society on 2 December 1875 (Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London (1875–6): ii); Lankester was blackballed at the same meeting.

Manuscript Alterations and Comments

1.1 that I have] ‘that’ after del ‘which I am’
1.2 excuse] pencil above del pencil ‘forgive’
1.2 deeply] pencil above del pencil ‘greatly’
1.2 I heard] after del ‘When I came to London on Friday’
1.4 personal] interl
1.5 embryology &c 1.6] ‘&c’ altered from ‘&’
1.6 & have] ‘&’ after del ‘on [theoretic]. subjects.’
1.6 seen] after del illeg
1.6 by] after del ‘in’
1.7 as far as] interl
1.7 are] after del ‘ought’
1.7 ought to] ‘to’ after del pencil ‘not’
1.8 elected] pencil above del pencil ‘blackballed’
1.8 agree most willingly] above del ‘feel pleasure & pride’
1.8 to second] ‘to’ above del ‘in’; ‘second’ altered from ‘seconding’
1.9 immediately] interl pencil
2.1 I] after del ‘I am aware that he is unpopular, but this does not seem to me to justify his exclusion, though [del ‘sufficient’] it wd do so in the case of an ordinary club. I do not believe anything else can be said against him, for by chance I was in communication about 6 months ago with a man who thought himself aggrieved by him, *& who had ample means of knowledge [interl] & yet admitted freely that he knew nothing whatever [interl] against him except his manners.— A second [‘Cambs’ interl del pencil] man, who dislikes him cordially *has just [interl] admitted *to me through my son [interl] the same fact & [over illeg] was just enough to express great indignation at his being blackballed.’
2.1 on good authority] interl before del illeg
2.1 reason] above del ‘grounds’
2.1 blackballed is] ‘is’ interl
3.1 & care] after del pencil ‘on any good grounds’
3.1 from … justifiable 3.3] interl
3.3 But] above del pencil ‘&’ and after pencil del ink ‘for’
3.4 & severely blamed] interl
3.4 (& which … [illeg] 3.5] interl
3.4 I think better 3.5] below del pencil ‘better’, below pencil del ink ‘been fairer to’
3.6 put] after del ‘reflect over what can be said in council of R. L, &’
3.6 in [imagination]] interl
3.6 the position] ‘the’ above del ‘his’
3.6 of R. L] interl
3.6 Suppose] after del ‘&’; ‘S’ over ‘s’
3.7 done … & had] interl; ‘had’ pencil
3.8 fees] after del ‘adm’
3.8 but] above del ‘&’
3.8 person] added
3.8 this] after interl & del ‘whether [pencil] perhaps [del pencil] justly perhaps or [above 2d ‘perhaps’] unjustly that’
3.8 was] over ‘an’
3.9 a very] above del ‘an’
3.9 on their part] interl pencil; ‘their’ ink over pencil ‘the’; before pencil del ink ‘of the Co’
3.9 have] interl
3.9 thought] after del ‘think’
3.10 as an … man] interl
3.11 thus cast] interl after pencil del ink ‘had’; ‘cast’ after interl pencil del ink ‘been’
3.11 on] after del ‘thrown’
3.11 said] after del ‘remembered’
3.12 no] over illeg
3.12 the last] added pencil
3.13 so] pencil above del pencil ‘very’ above del ‘so’
3.13 on this head,] added
3.13 that I wd … further 3.14] above del ‘that I *again beg you [del] venture to ask you &’; ‘further’ over pencil illeg
3.14 (though] parenthesis over comma
3.14 elected] after del ‘re’
3.15 blackballing is] pencil above ‘acts are’
3.15 half] interl
3.15 — I] after del ‘for [interl] which I *feel much [above del ‘most’] respect much [del] *on account of the good work it has done [pencil]’
3.15 have … let 3.17] pencil above del pencil ‘let’
3.18 in any case] after del ‘whether you will [illeg] the claim when’
3.19 for troubling you.] circled and transposed from after ‘Lankester’
3.19 am] pencil above ‘have’
3.19 [myself][being] 3.20] interl pencil after interl & del pencil illeg
3.20 agreed] after added & del ‘willingly’
3.20 to] after del ‘& it wd give me the’ and ‘& my anxious desire to [illeg]’ and before del illeg
3.20 candidature] after del ‘proposal’

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-10296,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-10296