My dear Sir
I do not know whether you look at the Edin. New. Phil. Journal, but if not, do read a very short letter from Studer at p. 186 of last Number.2 I have been pleased with it, as it confirms my facts & views on the “foliation” of gneiss &c. being quite distinct from stratification: Studer does not seem to have perceived that foliation is only much developed cleavage.—
I often think over what little I was able to understand of your Paper,3 & I anxiously look forward to read it in extenso.—4
When non=cleaving beds intervene between those with cleavage, have you ever noticed very carefully the lines of junction? do the edges of the cleavage planes ever indent in ever so small a degree the bases or tops of the intercalated non=cleaved beds. If you have time to send me one single line, just inform me on this head—
believe me | Yours very truly | C. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-1052,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on