From Raphael Meldola   13 September 1877

Entomological Society | London | 11, Chandos Street, | Cavendish Square. W.

Sept. 13th. 1877

Dear Sir,

When collecting notes on the subject of “mimicry” some years ago you were so good as to forward to me for perusal a letter from Fritz Müller, written from Brazil.1 I came across a copy of the letter when looking through my notes recently & on reading it through again decided that it contained a good deal of valuable entomological observation which in my opinion ought to be permanently recorded. I am therefore induced to ask your permission to allow me to make suitable extracts from the letter & read them at the next meeting of our Society for publication in our “Proceedings”.2

Allow me to add whilst addressing you that we should at all times highly value any notes on entomological subjects which you might favour us with & doubtless a great deal of such information must come into your hands without being of immediate service in your work.

I venture to think that occasional notes backed up by your authority would do a great deal towards stimulating philosophical Entomology in this Country by enforcing upon our workers the fact that the mere descriptions of species cannot constitute a true Science. In the present state of Entomology much more is thought of discovering a synonym than of observing a natural fact. To use a simile of Prof. Tait’s—the describers of species are the hodmen handing up materials to the master-builder who arranges them in order & shows their meaning.3

With the greatest respect, | I am, dear Sir, | Yours faithfully, | R. Meldola. | 21 John St. | Bedford Row, | London, W.C.

Ch. Darwin Esq. M.A. F.R.S. &c &c.

CD had enclosed the letter from Fritz Müller, 14 June 1871 (Correspondence vol. 19), with his letter to Meldola of 23 January [1872] (Correspondence vol. 20).
Although Meldola attended the meeting of the Entomological Society of London on 3 October 1877, there is no record that he read Müller’s letter (Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London (1877): xxii–xxv). Extracts from Müller’s letter did however form the basis of a later paper by Meldola in Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Meldola 1878). For Meldola’s role in publicising Müller’s work on mimicry, see Travis 2010.
A hodman is a bricklayer’s labourer. Peter Guthrie Tait likened the role of mathematicians in the understanding of natural phenomena to that of skilled builders, with naturalists and others as the ‘hodmen’ providing the raw materials (P. G. Tait 1876, p. 348).

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-11135,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-11135