To F. B. Goodacre   2 September 1879

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.

Sep 2. 79

Dear Sir,

I thank you for your very kind letter.1 The smallest of the birds of the second hatch shall be dispatched in the course of a few days to Dr Meadows.2 I will do nothing about the other birds until I hear from you. I suppose that any remaining birds must be killed & eaten but I feel that this is something like murder. I am glad to hear that you will send a paper on the subject to the Zoolog Soc; for there is nothing like discussion on all sorts of subjects.3 I should think, but cannot of course tell positively, that your paper would be printed by the council. What you say about the Soc neglecting domestic productions is extremely true, and I have often expressed my great regret with respect to this prejudice. I am much obliged for the offer of the drawings, but they would be of no use to me as my Note will consist of only a few lines just stating the fact of the birds having bred.4

My dear Sir | Yours very faithfully | Charles Darwin

Goodacre published a short paper stating his belief that the Chinese goose (Anser cygnoides) and the common goose (A. anser) were varieties of the same species in Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (Goodacre 1879; see letter from F. B. Goodacre, 1 September 1879 and n. 4).
CD’s note was eventually published in a letter to Nature, 21 January 1880, p. 207 (see letter to Nature, 15 December [1879]).

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-12214,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-12214