To Ernst Krause   28 November 1880

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | (Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.)

Nov. 28th 80

My dear Sir

I must thank you for your most interesting letter.1 It is very bad news about Kosmos: I shall regret much its cessation, for I found in every number something which interested me greatly. Anyhow you must have the satisfaction of feeling that you have been an excellent editor, & have aided Science in every way.—2

It is, also, grievous news about Fritz Müller,—that is if he has lost his instruments & books. I have long looked on him as the best observer in the world. I have written to his brother, Hermann, to learn whether he has suffered much loss, & whether for the sake of Science, he would allow me to aid him in purchasing new microscopes &c &c.—3

I do not know when I have been so much astonished, as by your account of the Crustacean which repairs its legs by those of an ancestral form. If I understand the case, it must be a kind of localised reversion! This seems to me to support, the hypothesis of Pangenesis, which has hardly any friends in this world. I can conceive a small collection of molecules (ie one of my imaginary gemmules) remaining dormant in an organism for almost any length of time; but I think it will be difficult for Häckel to make others believe that certain molecules, of which the body is built, have gone on vibrating for countless generations in a peculiar manner, so as to form when occasion offers an ancestral limb. If I remember rightly the reproduced tail of Lacerta differs from the normal tail. I have given one case in some slight degree analogous, namely that of a hen which when barren assumed the male plumage of an ancestral breed, & not of her own breed.—4 But I did not intend to trouble you with my notions or about pangenesis.—

My dear Sir | Yours sincerely | Chas. Darwin

See letter from Ernst Krause, 26 November 1880 and n. 4; Krause continued as editor of Kosmos until 1882.
In his letter of 26 November 1880, Krause told CD about a short article by Fritz Müller, ‘Haeckel’s biogenetisches Grundgesetz bei der Neubildung verlorener Glieder’ (Haeckel’s biogenetic law and the rebuilding of lost limbs; F. Müller 1881b). For CD’s hypothesis of pangenesis, see Variation 2: 357–404; it was revised in Variation 2d ed. 2: 349–99. For Ernst Haeckel’s theory of heredity, perigenesis, see Haeckel 1876. Lacerta is a genus of lizards; for CD’s observations, see Journal of researches (1860), p. 390. For CD’s examples of hens that acquired male characteristics, see Variation 2: 51, 54, and 399.

Manuscript Alterations and Comments

0.1 (Railway … S.E.R.)] parentheses added
1.4 an] interl
1.4 have] interl
2.4 of Science,] added

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-12871,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-12871