[6 Queen Anne Street,] London
Dec. 9th 1880
My dear Sir
I am sorry to say that I do not return home till middle of next week, & as I order no pamphlets to be forwarded to me by post, I cannot return the Geolog. Mag. until my return home.—1 Nor could my servants pick it out of the multitude which come by the Post. As I remarked in a letter to a friend, with whom I was discussing Wallace’s last book, the subject to which you refer seems to me a most perplexing one.2 The fact which I pointed out many years ago that all Oceanic islds are volcanic (except St. Paul’s, & now this is viewed by some as the nucleus of an ancient volcano) seems to me a strong argument that no continent ever occupied the great oceans.— Then there comes the statement from the Challenger that all sediment is deposited within 1 or 200 miles from the shores; though I shd. have thought this rather doubtful with respect to great rivers like the Amazons.—3
The Chalk formerly seemed to me best case of an Ocean having extended where a continent now stands, but it seems that some good judges deny that the chalk is an oceanic deposit.4 On the whole I lean to the side that continents have since Cambrian times occupied, approximately, their present positions.5 But as I have said the question seems a difficult one, & the more it is discussed the better.
Believe me | My dear Sir | Yours faithfully | Ch. Darwin
P.S. I have been compelled to write this note in haste—
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-12901,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on