Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | (Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.)
Aug. 21st 1881
My dear Hooker
I cannot aid you much or at all.1 I shd. think that no one could have thought on the modification of species, without thinking of representative species.— But I feel sure that no discussion of any importance had been published on this subject before the Origin; for if I had known of it, I shd. assuredly have alluded to it in the Origin, as I wished to gain support from all quarters. I did not then know of Von Buchs view (alluded to in my Historical Introduction in all the later editions). Von Buch published his “Isles Canaries” in 1836 & he here briefly argues that plants spread over a continent & vary, & the varieties in time come to be species.2 He also argues that closely allied species have been thus formed in the separate valleys of the Canary Islands, but not on the upper & open parts.
I have not Baer’s papers, but as far as I remember the subject is not fully discussed. by him.—3
I quite agree about Wallace’s position on the Ocean & Continent question.—4
To return to Geograph. Distribution: As far as I know no one ever discussed the meaning of the relation between representative species, before I did & as I suppose Wallace did in his paper before Linn. Soc.5 Von Buch’s is the nearest approach to such discussion, known to me.
Ever yours | Ch. Darwin
I could lend you Von Buchs Book if you like: I have just consulted passage
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-13293,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on