My dear Sir
I yesterday went carefully over some of your drawings. The outlines appear to me very accurate; but yet a few alterations are wanted in most of them; but these are trifling & refer chiefly to lines of growth.— The scale is not at all too large. What I now write for, is to beg you to do them a little harder & with the lines of growth more distinct. Some of the drawings have the muzziness of Lithography,—a style of art, (viz Lithog.) which in my opinion has been highly injurious to Nat. History— I do not care for artistic effect, but only for hard rigid accuracy. I can well believe that this is very difficult with mutilated specimens.—
Yours very sincerely | C. Darwin
P.S. | I was prevented coming on Thursday morning to the Gardens; otherwise I shd. have much enjoyed a walk with you over them.—2
P.S. I am sorry to say several of the valves in S. quadratum are incorrect— Your drawing in Min Conch.3 is more accurate. The inside drawings of the scuta in S. quadratum & S. fossula4 are useless, from indistinctness & shading, just like Lithographs. I beg you to avoid shading as much as possible—
I must bring up some of the specimens again & I must I am sorry to say give you the trouble of going over them again.—
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-1336,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on