To G. C. Wallich   28 March 1882

Down, | Beckenham, Kent.

Mar 28 1882

My dear Sir

You expressed quite correctly my views where you say that I had intentionally left the question of the origin of life uncanvassed as being altogether ultra vires in the present state of our knowledge, and that I dealt only with the manner of succession.1 I have met with no evidence that seems in the least trustworthy in favour of so-called spontaneous generation.2 I believe that I have somewhere said (but cannot find the passage) that the principle of continuity renders it probable that hereafter life will be shown to be a part or consequence of some general law; but this is only conjecture and not science3   I know nothing about the Protista, and shall be very glad to read your lecture when it is published, if you will be so kind as to send me a copy.

I remain, my dear Sir, | Yours very faithfully | Charles Darwin

CD had maintained a sceptical but open view on the question of spontaneous generation; for his interest in the debates over spontaneous generation, see Correspondence vol. 20, letters to A. R. Wallace, 28 August [1872] and [2 September 1872].
CD had made a similar observation in his letter to Daniel Mackintosh, 28 February 1882.

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-13747,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-13747