My dear Sir
It would give me real pleasure to assist you in any, the slightest, manner. The Coquimbo beds are described in my “Geological observations on S. America” p. 128— There were altogether 24 shells in the Carcharias bed,2 of which Mr Sowerby3 cd. not distinguish a Artemis & great Mytilus from recent species; & I feel sure that Balanus psittacus4 is recent, & I conclude that B. Coquimbensis is only a variety of another recent species, viz. B. lævis.5 There is much difficulty in deciding on age of the isolated Tertiary deposits on coast of Chile; the most probable conclusion seems to be that they are old Miocene or Eocene.— The generic character, I believe, is Miocene, but nearly all the species are distinct, & all according to M. d’Orbigny.—6
If you think it worth while you will see in work referred to, which is at Geolog. Soc, what little I have said on this subject.—
I shd. add that M. d’Orbigny does not agree with Mr Sowerby that the Artemis & Mytilus are recent species.—7
My dear Sir | Yours very sincerely | C. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-13872,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on