My dear Hooker
I am infinitely obliged for your opinion on the results from D. C. If you can spare 2 or 3 more vols. of D. C. & can send them by enclosed address on 16th, I will most gladly have them worked out: please choose whatever vols. you think best to try the result.2
But I cannot agree with you for my object, that general monographs are best: (1st) I presume the varieties wd. be best known in small country like ours; 2d. a very large genus might have very few species in many separate countries & then according to my doctrine, on average it wd not be a numerically increasing or varying genus. Again a genus, though small for its order in a monograph, might be large in any one country, & then it ought to be there on average an increasing or varying genus. For such & other reasons, I rely more on local floras, but I am very anxious to see how rule goes in whole orders. Generally perhaps universally I shd have expected, owing to great diffusion of plants, that same rule would hold in all cases, viz in local & mundane flora.—
I will see how Labiatæ are in Ledebour, Asa Gray & Koch;3 & I will divide the species in D. C. into two more equal bodies.—
I quite see that this case is a great blow to me; but please, observe, I now rest on pretty large induction. Britain by 3 separate & very different men (I long to try Bentham),4 France Germany. N. Italy, Roumelia, Ledebour (tried by separate volumes, & as whole) United States Canary Isd., India,, & N. Zealand.— All tell one story.—
Please thank Mr Bentham about Silene,5 & thanks for all other points in your letter.—
I have written to Müller & Moore.—6
You speak of my having “so few aids”; why you yourself for years & years have aided me in innumerable ways, lending me books, giving me endless facts, giving me your invaluable opinion & advise on all sorts of subjects, & more than all, your kindest sympathy.
My dear Hooker | Yours affectionately | C. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-2182,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on