My dear Sir
I thank you heartily for your kind letter of Decr 28th & for all the information in your power on the resistance of plants to your climate, & on their acclimatisation on your different elevations.2
I am especially obliged for your remarks on the several species having alpine & lowland forms, & for what you mention about some having & some not having intermediate varieties.— I will quote this part of your note; for it was exactly a point on which I wanted information.3
You state that the latter ie lowland forms have much smaller flowers, & frequently more numerous; leaves, longer, narrower & less coriaceous. I copy this for there is often a mistake in “latters” & “formers”— If I do not hear to contrary, I will assume that this description does apply to the low-land forms.— I see you do not mention “hariness”,—a character usually given to alpine forms, but which Hooker has been looking into for me & disputes or rather overthrows.4
I was lately struck by a remark in U. States naturalist, namely that introduced or naturalised plants at first overrun the whole country, & then in some degree diminish in numbers.5 Do you know of anything like this in Ceylon, where you have so many naturalised plants?— I can see some likely causes of error in the foregoing remark, & yet the fact in itself seems probable.
How interesting it would be to cultivate some of the upland forms in the low country & trace probable changes in successive generations.—
With my very sincere thanks, Yours very truly | Ch. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-2211,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on