To George Maw   31 August [1861]1

Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.

Aug. 31st

Dear Sir

I write merely to say how grateful I shall feel for any facts on correlation or criticisms.— Will you sometime please explain a little more fully about the contracted corolla of the Pelargonium with the narrow leaves.—2

You put the difficult case of correlated changes in structure at Birth in a very striking manner. Such cases of correlation, however, interest me less than that of the Pelargonium: for according to my notions, (whether false or true) if the period of gestation became from any cause (& it does vary) shorter, if the milk did not flow, the inheritance of the new variation would be stopped by the death of the progeny; & thus a bond of apparent correlation might arise: but, I presume that no one will doubt that the case of the pelargonium is due to petals & leaves being homologous & similar at a very early period & being similarly affected by some unknown cause.—3

Cases of old or injured females assuming male attributes is perhaps even more curious than the effects of castration on males.—

I shall be truly glad to hear any facts, when you have leisure & inclination to write to me & I beg leave to remain | Dear Sir | Yours sincerely | Charles Darwin

Manuscript Alterations and Comments

2.8 some] above del ‘the’

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-3239,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-3239