Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.
Oct. 20th
My dear Lyell
Notwithstanding the Orchids, I have been very glad to see Jamieson’s letter: no doubt, as he says, certainty will soon be reached.1
With respect to the minor point of Glen Roy, I cannot feel easy with a mere barrier of ice; there is so much sloping stratified detritus in the valleys: I remember that you somewhere have stated that a running stream soon cuts deeply into a glacier.— I have been hunting up all old references & pamphlets &c on shelves in Scotland & will send them off to Mr. J., as they may possibly be of use to him; if he continues the subject. The Eildon Hills ought to be especially examined. Amongst M.S. I came across a very old letter from me to you, in which I say “If a glacialist admitted that the sea, before the formation of the shelves, covered the country (which would account for the land-straits above the level of the shelves) & if he admitted that the land gradually emerged; & if he supposed that his lakes were banked up by ice alone, he would make out, in my opinion, the best case against the marine origin of the Shelves”.—2 This seems very much what Mr J. & you have come to. The whole Glacial Theory is really a magnificent subject.—
I have been working terribly hard lately (for me) at Orchids. The subject is, I fear, too complex for the Public & I fear I have made a great mistake in not keeping to my first intention of sending it to Linnean Socy.; but it is now too late, & I must make the best of a bad job.—
Yours affecy | C. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-3291,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on