My dear Gray
I have to thank you for 2 or 3 little notes.3 The last I was glad to receive on Lyell, & will tell him, when I write, what you say on Species-portion.4 I am pleased at it; but cannot quite agree. You speak of Lyell as a Judge; now what I complain of is that he declines to be Judge. It put me into despair, when I see such men as Lyell & you incapable (as you think) of deciding: I have sometimes almost wished that Lyell had pronounced against me.5 When I say “me”; I mean only change of species by descent. That seems to me the turning point. Personally, of course, I care much about Natural Selection; but that seems to me utterly unimportant compared to question of Creation or Modification.— Like a huge Ass I have written two stupid letters to Athenæum:6 the latter to above effect.— How clever & original & candid your remark about Language & Design.—7
Your little discussion on Angles of Divergence of leaves in a Spire has almost driven me mad.8 My 2d Boy George is a good mathematician, & when I showed him the fractions, he said they formed a converging series;9 & I see when protracted, they do all crowd round one point.
I have been drawing all the real angles & unreal angles on a spire, & I see the angles which do not occur in nature, are just as symmetrical in position as the real angles.10 If you wish to save me from a miserable death, do tell me why the angles of &c series occur, & no other angles.—11 It is enough to drive the quietest man mad.—
Did you & some mathematician publish some paper on subject; Hooker says you did.12 Where is it? I have been visiting for a fortnight houses of relation to try to get a little health for my youngest Boy (the Natural Selection Hero) & self;13 with very poor success. This has led me to muddle my brains over the angles of leaves.— Do you know of any plant in which angle is fluctuating or variable? I often bless science; for when observing I forget my discomfort & at no other time am I comfortable for two successive hours.— Remembering your statements I have been looking at Plantago lanceolata—14 it is a Female Dichogam which is rather rare (ie pistil mature & fertilised long before anthers of same flower mature); fertilised by the wind; and a few plants have imperfect anthers, containing little pollen & a part of this imperfect.—
Euphorbia amygdaloides I find, is also a female dichogamous monoœcious plant, & which is diœcious in function at any one period.15 But why I bother you with these trifling facts, I know not, except that I have nothing to do, & writing to you makes me forget my own odious self.—
Farewell my kind & good friend. If you can spare copy, send me one on De Candolle.16
Farewell— Yours most truly | C. Darwin
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-4153,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on