My dear Oliver—
Will you be so kind as to give me your opinion on the following point? I was so much struck with the corresponding position of tendril & flower stalk in Passiflora that I got my son William2 (who can dissect under a & can draw) to examine these parts in their earliest stages. In the enclosed drawing (which please to return) you will see Fig. 1 the tendril & flower bud apparently quite confluent which seems odd.3 From Fig. 2. to 7 you will see the gradation. The sort of horn to the left is the outer division of the involuca which in the early stages is the most developed.4 In one single case of an old bud Fig. A my son found the top of the tendril absolutely like a flower bud in an early stage as in Fig. 3 or 4.5
Does not this render it highly probable that the tendril is a modified flower with its peduncle?6 I presume that a flower wd be called by you an axillary part??7 & that in the vine the tendril might be considered a modified flower peduncle as I now see Lindley maintains that it is.8
It wd I have reason to think be a considerable relief to me, if I might view such tendrils as modified flower stalks instead of modified branches9
Pray tell me is there any essential distinction between the peduncle & mid rib of a leaf, & a branch? for does not a leaf some times produce buds?10
It wd a great kindness if some day you wd look at the plants of Tecoma Radicans & observe if the branches spirally twine—11 I suppose they do not—
Also wd ⟨y⟩ou look at Tecoma Undulata & Capensis— How can they climb? Do they twine or do they emit rootlets like T. Radicans? My plants tho’ 4 ft. high shew no signs of climbing.12 I am much interested about the Genus Tecoma.
Believe me dear Oliver | yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin
Passionflower
floribunda
tendrils appear on different sides of flower, but in same branch on the same side.
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-4424,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on