From J. D. Hooker   25 December 1866

Kew

Dec 25/66

Dear Darwin

I was about to write today, when your jolly letter came this morning1 to tell you that after carefully going over the N. Z. Flora, I find that there are only about 30 reputed indigenous Dicot annuals, of which almost half, not being found by Banks & Solander, are probably non-indigenous.2 This is just 120 of the Dicots. or excluding the doubtful about 140 th. whereas the British proportion of annuals is 1/4–6 amongst Dicots.!!! Of the Naturalized New Zealand plants, one-half are annual!3

I suppose there can be no doubt but that a deciduous leaved vegetation affords more conditions for vegetable life than an evergreen one—& that it is hence that we find countries characterized by uniform climates to be poor in species & these to be evergreen— I can now work this point out for New Zealand & Britain.

Japan may be an exception   It is an Extraordinary Evergreen country & has many species apparently, but it has so much novelty that it may not be so rich in species really as it hence looks, & I do believe it is very poor. It has very few annuals.

Then again I think that the number of plants with irregular flowers, & especially such as require insect agency, diminishes much with Evergreenity

Hence in all humid temperate regions we have as a rule Few species,—many evergreens, few annuals,—few Leguminosæ & Orchids,—few Lepidoptera & other flying Insects—many Coniferæ, Amentacea,4 Gramineæ Cyperaceæ & other wind fertilized trees & plants &c.

Orchids & Leguminosæ are scarce in Islets because the necessary fertilizing insects have not migrated with the plants. Perhaps you have published this5

Ever | J. D Hooker.

CD annotations6

2.1 I suppose … one— 2.2] triple scored pencil; ‘is not this one of results?’ added pencil
2.2 & that … evergreen— 2.4] ‘How in Arctic Region & Tropics, not subject to doubt’ added pencil
5.1 Hence … regions] ‘does not here imply equability’ added pencil
6.1 Orchids … this 6.2] scored pencil; ‘No’ added pencil
End of letter: ‘Keeling Is’ pencil del pencil; ‘Coral islet any irregular flower’ pencil
Hooker refers to his Flora Novæ-Zelandiæ (J. D. Hooker 1853–5) and to Joseph Banks and Daniel Solander, botanists on the Endeavour voyage of 1768 to 1771 (DNB). ‘Dicot.’: dicotyledonous.
‘Amentaceae’: an old grouping of catkin-bearing plants, since separated into a number of families in modern systems of classification (Lindley 1853, p. xxxiii; Mabberley 1997, s.v. Amentiferae).
In Origin, p. 97, CD had argued that the fertility of papilionaceous plants (Leguminosae) was greatly reduced if bees were excluded. He had suggested in a letter to Hooker that the ‘remarkable absence’ of papilionaceous plants in New Zealand might be explained by the absence of hive bees (see Correspondence vol. 7, letter to J. D. Hooker, 12 January [1858]; see also letter to the Gardeners’ Chronicle, [before 13 November 1858] (Collected papers 2: 19–25)). CD had suggested that Hooker compare the number of species that, like members of the Leguminosae, had irregular flowers in New Zealand and England (see Correspondence vol. 13, letter to J. D. Hooker, 7 January [1865] and nn. 9 and 10).
CD’s annotations mostly refer to points he wanted to bring up in his reply to Hooker (see Correspondence vol. 15, letter to J. D. Hooker, 9 January [1867]).

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-5324,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-5324