My dear Bates
I am in utter confusion; will you kindly clarify my mind.— Westwood divides saltatorial Orthopt. (modern. Class. vol. 2. p. 439)2 into
| Achetidæ | = | ? |
| Gryllidæ | = | ? |
| Locustidæ | = | ? |
Now you speak (amazons vol. I. p. 250) of Achetidæ, Locustidæ & Acridiidæ.— Now will you homologise these families for me, & tell which terms will be most generally understood, which I care more about than which are most strictly correct.3
Again, & more important for me, you say that (p. 252) in the Achetidæ (I suppose of Westwood likewise) “the wing-cases are symmetrical both have straight edges … a distinct portion is not set apart … for sound-producing” … 4
Now how can I reconcile this with Westwood (p. 440) who gives drawing of the two wings which are not strictly symmetrical, one is ♂ & the other ♀ & one of which is furnished “with a distinct portion” for sound producing.—5 Is it that some species of crickets have both wings similar?
I shd. be grateful if you would kindly aid me as far as you can, & excuse me troubling you
Yours very sincerely | C. Darwin
Harris places Platyphyllum concavum, the “Katy-did”, in the Gryllidæ, is this the Gryllidæ of Westwood?6
I suppose the “Field cricket” belongs to Achetidæ of all authors.—7
Your Chlorocœtus cannot belong to the Locustidæ of Westwood, but I suppose to his Gryllidæ.8
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-5895,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on