Down. | Beckenham | Kent. S.E.
Oct 14. 1869
My dear Huxley
I have been delighted to see yr Rev. of Häckel, & as usual you pile honours high on my head.1 But I write now (requiring no answer) to groan a little over what you have said about rudimentary organs. Many heretics will take advantage of what you have said. I cannot but think that the explanation given at p. 541 of the last Ed of the Origin of the long retention of rudimentary organs & of their greater relative size during early life, is satisfactory.2 Their final & complete abortion seems to me a much greater difficulty. Do look in my “Var under Dom.” Vol. 2. p 397. at what Pangenesis suggests on this head, though I did not dare to put it in the Origin.3
The passage bears also a little on the struggle between the molecules or gemmules. There is likewise a word or 2 indirectly bearing on this subject at p 394–395. It won’t take you 5 minutes, so do look at these passages.
I am very glad that you have been bold enough to give yr idea about nat. selection amongst the molecules, though I cannot quite follow you.4
Whenever you can spare time let me hear about the horse’s tooth from S. America—5
Ever yours most truly | Charles Darwin
Good Heavens what a deal of work there is in you.—
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-6936,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on