From William Kemp   24 November 1843

Galashiels

24th Novr.—1843

Sir

I have examined the paper sent for my approval, and I beg to say that I am more than pleased with the manner in which you have drawn it up. I beleave that it embraces all that is worth notice in the case, I do not think more could have been done even had you been witness to all concerning it.— I have not an idea, or a word to add, or take from it.—1

I thank you for a perusal of the Gardeners Chronicle, I have seen the article aluded to in the papers of the day but in that I admire the prudent caution given to su⁠⟨⁠b⁠⟩⁠stantiate by the clearest evidance any discovery of that nature. Doubtes may still be intertained in this case, that I cannot help; however, were it a case in Law it could be proven by the best of evidance. Fortunately a Mr. Bell of Melrose, the proprietor of the place, was at the sand-pit at the time of the discovery,2 who is now sorrie that he had not kept a few of the seeds. You may rest satisfied that even the antiquety of the Egyptian Wheat3 is not more genuine than this is.

With this I hope you will receive the Chronicle safely.

I am Sir | With the warmest gratitude | your much Obliged and, | very Humble Servant | William Kemp Charles Darwin Esqre.

CD’s draft of the paper is in DAR 50: 1–6. The published version (Kemp 1844) is, except for a few changes, a verbatim copy of the draft. See Appendix VI. See Correspondence vol. 18, Supplement, letter to William Kemp, 22 November [1843].
John Bell. The fact that Bell was a witness was added to the first paragraph of the published version.

Please cite as “DCP-LETT-716,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/dcp-data/letters/DCP-LETT-716