Carlisle.
May 3. 1871
Sir
Permit me to call your attention to what you say in your first Chapt. (“Descent of Man”) regarding the “Supra Condyloid Foramen.” You give my pupil & friend Dr Struthers the credit which is really due my old teacher Dr Knox.1 If you cd. find time to read p 249–252 of my Life of Knox pubd. by MacMillan & Co last october, you will see the whole subject fully discussed.2 Twenty years before Struthers wrote on the subject, Knox had described the “Sup. Condy. process” in the Edin. Med: & Surg. Journal; and considering the mode in which Knox predicted the human homologue I feel certain that you will be ready to do the old anatomist justice.3 Struthers only began to study Anatomy the year (1842) that I said my case; of the same Sup: Condyloid process.
Though I have not the honour of your personal acquaintance I hope I may be permitted to add my hearty congratulations to others of your friends on the rapid growth of your views, of the success of your labours in science.
I am yours truly | Henry Lonsdale | M.D.
P.S. In my biography of John Goodsir I alluded to the happy generalization of Knox (Vol 1. p. 26. Goodsir’s Anatomical Memoirs).4
To | Chas. Darwin. | Author of the Descent of Man.
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-7736,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on