32 Harley Str | London. | (W.C.)
24 day of Novr 1871
My dear Darwin
I am much obliged to you for the sight of Mr Gillman’s letter. I was not before aware that platycnemic tibiæ had been met with in America and am much interested in learning the fact.—1 I do not know whether you have seen a few remarks I made on this peculiarity as observed in some Welsh remains but if so you will find that I thought there was reason to believe that platycnemism was of two kinds—one of which was exemplyfied in the Gibraltar & Cro-Magnon tibiæ and the other in those fm Wales—2
I should therefore be very glad to learn which of the two forms was found in America—but to this point Mr Gillman does not refer. If you thought it worth while I would send him a copy of my paper.
The proportion of antero-posterior to transverse diameter given by him viz about .60—is very nearly the same as in the Welsh tibiæ and is Greater than in the Gibraltar bones & much greater than in the Cro-magnon tibiæ whose latitudinal index as I term it is not .60 as he supposes but .41 (1.1” to .45” The existence of this curious conformation so extensively among the priscan3 races in both hemispheres is very remarkable and well worthy of further enquiry. That it can hardly be considered in any way as indicative of a Simian tendency is, as it seems to me pretty clear from the circumstance that human platycnemic tibiæ have a lower latitudinal ridge than those of the Gorilla & Chimpanzee.4
Yours very truly | Geo Busk
Please cite as “DCP-LETT-8084,” in Ɛpsilon: The Charles Darwin Collection accessed on