Royal Society of Literature,
4, St Martin’s Place, W. C.
4. Che
May 13. 1874
Dear Mr Talbot
Thank you for your letter 1 – I dont think Harrison 2 will make any objection to lend our Printer J. E. Taylor & Co as much cuneiform type as may be wanted – for your paper –
Quite at your leisure – will you enlighten my ignorance on this point? On the plan commonly called [illegible] Susa – Layard 3 series 2. Pl. 49 (or 48) is a brief Legend – one word apparently – in Cuneiform.
Does this word read Susa? Am I justified in saying that the plan is known to be Susa from the name there on?
Ever sincerely Yrs
W. S. W. Vaux
[envelope:]
H. Fox Talbot Esq
FRS
Laycock Abbey
Chippenham
Wilts
Please cite as “TALBOT2796,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on