Dear Sir,
I am delighted to hear that you are to have the Rumford Medals. 1 I had prepared a Philippic 2 against the R Society 3 for their treatment of the Calotype; 4 but I am now at peace with them on that score. I will mention it of course; & there will be plenty time before my Paper 5 goes to press to receive whatever information you may wish to send me.
You never mentioned to me at Lacock Abbey any thing about wax. I should like to know what kind of wax you use, & how you use it. 6 I cannot understand Mr Collin’s 7 Process. His faces are beautiful, & his drapery the worst possible. Why are his drawings like China Ink ones? He must take his positives with difft materials not from those we use.
I have finished my acct of the Daguerreotype, 8 and had mentioned Claudet’s 9 improvements. I presume it is understood that Daguerre 10 never made any Photographs on Paper. Arago 11 seems to state that he did in the Comptes Rendus 1839 Tom VIII p. 208, 12 and that they rejected your processes for better ones. I cannot see in the future Nos any contradiction of this; but I presume I may safely do it.– You may write me till the 20th or 25th of Novr. Did I send you a large Portrait of Lord Campbell & Sir George Campbell? 13 Some of the positives are perfect Rembrandts. Major Playfair 14 has taken some groups with many figures which are singularly fine.
I think the Salt in the Positive paper does more harm than good. I am working without it.
I am Dear Sir Ever Most Truly yrs
D Brewster
St Leonards College
Octr 29th 1842
H.F. Talbot Esqr.
Please cite as “TALBOT4635,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on