[draft]
Dilke
Feb 18 / 50
Observing that ^ye name of Mr D junr occupies an honble posn among those to whom the carrying out of Prince Albert’s magnificent scheme of the grand a general Exhibition of Industry is entrusted, I am desirs of mentg a subject There is respecting wch I shd be glad to ask his [illegible deletion] opinn & advice ^as well as your own if you will be kind enough to give it to me –
I am thinking of offering a considerable prize, say for example 100£, for the best specimen of photography on paper that is sent to shown at ye Exhibition
and a similar & equal prize for the best specimen of Dtype and I shd be glad to know whether you think there wd be any objectn to my offering such prizes? and whether I could offer the one second with equal propriety as the first?
In my own hble judt it wd be better to offer both. I shd prefer doing so to offering only 1 prize if it is thought unobjectionable.
H. F. T.
P.S.
As some persons have expressed an interest respecting my ^late patent for “impts in photy“
I will take this oppy of mentg (altho’ I am not aware whether perhaps it is a matter of little conseqce) – that the process of photy on glass coated with albumen, is not one of the Improvements therein ^referred to or contemplated
the first?
In my own hble judgmt it wd be better to offer both. I shd prefer doing so to offering only 1 prize if it is thought unobjectionable.
[expanded version]
Dilke
February 18, 1850
Observing that the name of Mr Dilke, junr 1 occupies an honorable position among those to whom the carrying out of Prince Albert’s magnificent scheme of the grand a general Exhibition of Industry 2 is entrusted, I am desirous of mentioning a subject There is respecting which I should be glad to ask his [illegible deletion] opinion and advice as well as your own if you will be kind enough to give it to me –
I am thinking of offering a considerable prize, say for example £100, for the best specimen of photography on paper that is sent to shown at the Exhibition and a similar and equal prize for the best specimen of Daguerreotype and I should be glad to know whether you think there would be any objection to my offering such prizes? and whether I could offer the one second with equal propriety as the first? In my own humble judgment it would be better to offer both. I should prefer doing so to offering only one prize if it is thought unobjectionable.3
H. F. T.
P.S. As some persons have expressed an interest respecting my late patent for “improvements in photography” 4I will take this opportunity of mentioning (although I am not aware whether perhaps it is a matter of little consequence) – that the process of photography on glass coated with albumen, is not one of the Improvements therein referred to or contemplated
Please cite as “TALBOT6304,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on