TALBOT6543

(Stamp within)

Sir

I observe you take exception in Records of Past [sic], Vol. V. to Belshazzar being deemed the grandson of Nebuchadnezzar – from which conclusion arises the question – is the margin in Dan: of grandfather, to be considered an error?

You are no doubt aware of the similar case in 2 Sam: ix. 7 where Saul is spoken of as the father of his Son’s son Mephibosheth? Also 2 K. viii. 25. Athaliah daughter (granddaur) of Omri? might be cited.

I am not sufficient Hebraist to know (nor have I the Septugt ) if the [illeg, underlined] word is the same in Saml & Danl?

May I also ask if no reliance can be placed on the Statement by Josephus Antiq. xi. 2? from which it can scarcely be inferred that Belshazzar was Son of Nebuchadnezzar.

I have sent this thro’ Mr W R. Cooper, altho’ I am not at present a member of his Socy.

I enclose a Stamp for the favour of your reply, & remain

Yrs truly
H M Wilkinson
(layman)

25 Blandford Sqre London
NW
28 March 1876

Please cite as “TALBOT6543,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/epsilon-testbed/talbot/letters/TALBOT6543