[draft:]
Bolt.
Dec 22/59
I will thk y / write a lr to Mr Pretsch [Gt Portld St] saying 1. Mr T. ackns rect of Mr P's lr of Dec 21
2. Mr T. stated several mths ago on what terms he wd give a lics to Mr P. but he never recd any reply whatever to that commn He had long ago come to the conclusn that the terms were unacceptle to Mr P.
3. But fm Mr Ps lr now recd it appears that Mr P he wishes for a licse but with an altern in the terms of it.
4. Mr T. cannot consent to alter the terms
5. Mr T. believes his own process to be much superior to any other conseqly he will not consent to join adopt any other process conjointly wth his own
6. In reply to Mr Pretsch's questn Mr T. wd consider any process to be an infgt of his own, which employed bichr. pot. in conjn with gelatine
[expanded version:]
Bolton
22 December 1859
I will thank you to write a letter to Mr Pretsch 1 [Great Portland Street] saying1. Mr Talbot acknowledges receipt of Mr Pretsch's letter of December 21
2. Mr Talbot stated several months ago on what terms he would give a licence 2 to Mr Pretsch but he never received any reply whatever to that communication He therefore had long ago come to the conclusion that the terms were unacceptable to Mr Pretsch.
3. But from Mr Pretsch's letter now received it appears that Mr Pretsch he wishes for a licence but with an alteration in the terms of it.
4. Mr Talbot cannot consent to alter the terms
5. Mr Talbot believes his own process 3 to be much superior to any other consequently he will not consent to join adopt any other process conjointly with his own
6. In reply to Mr Pretsch's question Mr Talbot would consider any process to be an infringement of his own, which employed bichromate of potassium in conjunction with gelatine
Please cite as “TALBOT8012,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on