R As Soc. 1
19th March, 1860
My dear Sir,
Last week I proposed to Panizzi 2 that we should publish all that is done, without waiting for the Liste raisonnée from Rawlinson, 3 from whom I have not received a word since his departure; this day we have reports that he is about to return shortly, so that I cannot say what may be the result of my proposition to the British Museum; but I hope the issue of the sheets may not be delayed much longer.
In regard to the printing of your paper in our Journal, 4 I understood from you that you would very soon send me a copy of Grotefend’s cylinder 5 transliterated in the usual way, in roman [sic] letters, to accompany the translation; I did not therefore bring the printing before our Council, but I will do so, if you wish, though I should be better pleased to see the transliteration accompany the translation.
I think it would be well to put the 63-line cylinder in Rawlinson’s second volume, as the one in the British Museum series is so incorrect: here and there however, I have found a character better expressed in the latter than in Grotefend’s copy, but very rarely.
I have made as good a collation as I could of the three [illegible] inscriptions and have sent the result to Rawlinson for his imprimatum [sic] Even with all the copies there remain still very many lacunæ; but a [illegible] is legible.
I remain my dear Sir yours faithfully
Edwin Norris
H Fox Talbot, Esq
&c &c
Please cite as “TALBOT8059,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on