TALBOT8111

Foreign office
6 June, 1860.

Dear Sir

I cannot agree with [ritziput?]; we should have had diagram not diagram, and the little dictionary I have here gives, not condidit, but tesselavit, stravit, exornavit, distinxit. Moreover Vaux, with his nail, scratched out the dirt, and clearly read diagram. This could not have been Layard’s Brick, it was brought to the museum from the country only a few days before we saw it.

I had a letter from Rawlinson yesterday, who returned the Syllabaries together with portions of several other fragments which he copied himself, some years ago, but which I have not found; so that we shall have a valuable collection. I wish he had given them to me before his departure; but he went off in a great hurry at last.

I have not forgotten to send the Nakshi Rustam Inscription, but the printer has not yet had leisure to search for the bundle, and the copy I have used myself is old and dirty, and has my ticks and memorial marks upon it. I have no doubt I shall get another in a day or two.

Yours truly
Edwin Norris

H F Talbot Esq
&c &c

[envelope:]
H F Talbot Esq
Lacock Abbey
Chippenham

Please cite as “TALBOT8111,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/epsilon-testbed/talbot/letters/TALBOT8111