TALBOT8580

Foreign office
17 July, 1862

Dear Sir

I believe diagram of Bellino’s Sennacharib cylinder at beginning to be diagram like diagram of E I H. i.18. of the Senkirch cylinder i.2. of the Babylonian Cyl. i.11. Also diagram of Taylors Sennacharib i.32 to be the same as diagram both diagram. Mudninnú of course the participle of diagram. I might find more examples but I am very busy over some long German State papers that will not allow me to look at Assyrian for some days.– I don’t think the above afford ‘a proof,’ we can only expect probability, and probabilities accumulate and become proofs. Certainly diagram is not diagram. I do not think diagram is known either as to reading or version, but tenisit I am satisfied means mankind. I do not think kalati ever occurs, but am of opinion that it always forms part of following word. But I am not sure.

Please excuse this brief scrawl.

Yours faithfully
Edwin Norris

H F. Talbot Esq
&c &c &c

[envelope:]
H. Fox Talbot Esq
Millburn Tower
Edinburgh

Please cite as “TALBOT8580,” in Ɛpsilon: accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/epsilon-testbed/talbot/letters/TALBOT8580