Dear Sir,
I deferred answering your note under an impression I might possibly meet you at the RS tonight - that not being the case though late, I will make no further apologies, but merely state that my opinion as to the propriety of appending the remarks in my note to your paper1 remains unaltered, even by your expression of a wish that they should be so - which I hope you will understand in the sense I mean it as originating in a sense of something like indelicacy towards the Society in its Secretaries publicly commenting on the contents of papers, which necessarily come into their hands before those of the Members & (however perfectly understood in particular cases) might tend to establish a precedent that might prove very inconvenient in future. I hope therefore you will not take it amiss if I still request you to look on the remarks as purely conversational, and I remain | dear Sir | Yours very truly | J.F.W. Herschel
Thursday June 8. 1826
Address: M. Faraday Esq | Royal Institution | Albemarle Street
FARADAY, Michael (1826b): “On the existence of a limit to vaporization”, Phil. Trans., 116: 484-93.
Please cite as “Faraday0299,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday0299