William Henry Fox Talbot to Faraday   Late March 1832

31 Sackville St. | Thursday

Dear Sir,

I think the contrast between the Nickel & Copper solutions would be still more remarkably shown, by viewing them through what is called "Red Fire"1. Some day I shall have the opportunity I hope of trying the experiment. These researches deserve to be multiplied, as there is evidently a connexion between Optics and Chemistry which cannot fail to throw light on the latter. Dr Brewster imagines that all simple substances have a different action on light2. I think that something of the sort will be found to be true, tho not perhaps exactly that.

Dr. B. informs me of a late very curious discovery of his, of a liquid (which he does not name, but says it is a compound of only 2 elements) which has the property of absorbing partially the light of a candle so as to make the spectrum formed by candlelight to resemble the Solar Spectrum, viz. to make it appear covered with small lines or bands3. I hope he means to publish this, as being very likely to explain the nature of the Sun's light & atmosphere4.

Yours truly | H.F. Talbot


Endorsed by Faraday: 1832

See note 1, letter 558.
Brewster (1834), 519. Read in April 1833.
See Brewster to Talbot, nd, National Museum of Photography, File and Television, MS.
This was nitrous acid gas. Brewster did not announce the name of this gas until April 1833, (ibid.). However, by then its name was already fairly well known. See James (1983), 343.

Bibliography

BREWSTER, David (1834): “Observations on the Lines of the Solar Spectrum, and on those produced by the Earth's Atmosphere, and by the action of Nitrous Acid Gas”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 12: 519-30.

JAMES, Frank A.J.L. (1983): “The debate on the nature of the absorption of light, 1830-1835: A core-set analysis”, Hist. Sci., 21: 335-68.

Please cite as “Faraday0559,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 19 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday0559